Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site R106XY077NE

Shallow Limy

Last updated: 6/09/2025
Accessed: 12/05/2025

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 106X / Ecological site R106XY077NE

USC

Metric

General information

Approved. An approved ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model, enough information to identify the ecological site, and full documentation for all ecosystem states contained in the state and transition model.

Click to explore map

Figure 1. Mapped extent

Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 106X–Nebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills

Named the “Nebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills,” Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 106 is divided almost evenly between southeastern Nebraska (52%), and northeastern Kansas, (48%). The approximately seven-million-acre landscape covers all or parts of thirty counties between the two states. The northern border is located on the north end of Saunders County, Nebraska, and the MLRA extends into Douglas County, Kansas in the south. The Nebraska cities of Beatrice and Lincoln are the major population centers in the north, while Topeka and Lawrence in Kansas are the primary cities in the south. The Platte, Little Nemaha, and the North Fork of the Big Nemaha Rivers flow through the Nebraska side of the MLRA, while the Black Vermillion, the Soldier, and the Delaware Rivers are the major waterways on the Kansas side. The Big Blue River runs through both states, while the Salt Creek hydrologic system located near Lincoln, Nebraska provides habitat for the only known population of the Federally listed endangered Salt Creek Tiger Beetle.

This dissected glacial drift plain primarily consists of broad, smooth ridgetops, and slopes ranging from nearly level to steep. The elevation in MLRA 106 decreases from west to east, and ranges from nearly 1,650 feet to less than 790 feet above sea level. Stream valleys in this landscape are narrow and bordered by steep hills, with 10 to 20 feet of local relief. The river valleys are broader and may drop up to over 160 feet below the adjacent hilltops. The uplands are primarily comprised of glacial drift underlying a mantle of loess, while alluvial deposits are found in the stream and river valleys. Limestone and shale quarries are also located in MLRA 106. The predominant soil orders in this MLRA are mesic, udic, Mollisols, Alfisols, and Entisols. Loams and clays are the primary soil textures in this landscape.

Sixty-two percent of the land in this MLRA has been broken out of native prairie and farmed, while only 23 percent of the grasslands remain. Livestock grazing, primarily by cattle, is the main industry on these remnants. Corn, wheat, soybeans, and grain sorghum are the primary commodity crops, but a significant number of acres are also planted to alfalfa for harvest as hay. With annual precipitation averaging from 40 inches in the southeast, to 28 inches in the northwest, irrigation for crop production is not a critical factor in most years.

The historical matrix vegetation type is Tallgrass Prairie, and big and little bluestem, switchgrass, Indiangrass, sideoats, and blue grama make up the bulk of the warm season species. Historically, western wheatgrass was the dominant cool season grass but today the dominant cool season grasses are introduced grasses, smooth brome in the north and tall fescue in the south. Large and small patch vegetative communities are found primarily along the riparian zones, and on both upland and lowland saline sites. Woodlands make up about six percent of MLRA 106, consisting primarily of green ash, oak, hackberry, boxelder, and maple trees.

Wildlife flourishes in this combination of crop and grassland environments. In a landscape historically occupied by bison herds, white-tailed deer are now the most abundant wild ungulates. A variety of smaller species, including coyote, raccoon, opossum, porcupines, muskrat, beaver, squirrel, and mink thrive in the region. Native grassland bird populations are limited by the lack of contiguous native prairie and the fragmented habitat created by the farmland. The rivers, streams, and lakes harbor excellent fisheries, and migrating and local waterfowl use the wetland complexes. These complexes provide ideal habitat for wading and shore bird species as well.

This landscape serves as a backdrop for a disturbance driven ecosystem, evolving under the influences of herbivory, fire, and variable climate. Historically, these processes created a heterogeneous mosaic of plant communities and structure heights across the region. Any given site in this landscape experienced fire every three to four years. Fires were caused by lightning strikes and also were set by Native Americans, who used fire for warfare, signaling, and to refresh the native grasses. The Indigenous inhabitants understood the value of fire as a tool and that the highly palatable growth following a fire provided excellent forage for their horses and attracted grazing game animals such as bison and elk.

Land use patterns by post European settlers have fragmented the native grasslands through conversion to cropland, transportation corridors, and other developments. This has significantly altered the natural fire regime allowing encroachment by native and introduced shrubs and trees into the native prairie remnants throughout the MLRA. Aggressive fire suppression policies have exacerbated this process to the point that shrub and tree encroachment is a major ecological threat in the majority of both native and reseeded grasslands. Introduction of eastern red cedar as a windbreak species further facilitates invasion by this species. While eastern red cedar is native to the landscape, the historic population in MLRA 106 was limited to isolated pockets in rugged river drainageways that were protected from fire. Widespread plantings of windbreaks with eastern red cedar as a primary component have provided a seed source for the aggressive woody plant. The ensuing encroachment into the native grasslands degrades the native wildlife habit and causes significant forage loss for domestic livestock. Since it is not a root sprouter, eastern red cedar is very susceptible to fire when under six feet tall. Management with prescribed fire is exceedingly effective if applied before this stage. Larger eastern red cedars can also be controlled with fire, but successful application requires the use of specifically designed ignition and holding techniques.

Classification relationships

►USDA-NRCS (2022)◄
Land Resource Region – M, Central Feed Grains and Livestock Region
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) – 106

►Fenneman (1916) Physiographic Regions ◄
Division – Interior Plains
Province – Central Lowland
Section – Dissected Till Plains

►USDA-USFS (2007) Ecoregions◄
Domain – Humid Temperate
Division – Prairie
Province – Prairie Parkland (Temperate)
Section – Central Dissected Till Plains (251C)

►EPA Ecoregions (Omernik 1997)◄
I – Great Plains (9)
II – Temperate Prairies (9.2)
III – Western Corn Belt Plains (9.2.3)
IV – Loess and Glacial Drift Hills (47i)

►Associated Counties◄
Nebraska: Butler, Cass, Gage, Jefferson, Johnson, Lancaster, Nemaha, Otoe, Pawnee, Richardson, Saline, Saunders, Seward

Kansas: Atchison, Brown, Doniphan, Douglas, Franklin, Jackson, Jefferson, Johnson, Leavenworth, Marshall, Nemaha, Osage, Pottawatomie, Shawnee, Wabaunsee, Washington, Wyandotte

Ecological site concept

The Shallow Limy ecological site is located on nearly level to sloping upland landscapes and does not receive additional moisture from runoff or overflow. The site supplies runoff water to those sites lower in the landscape. Slopes typically range from 3 to 20 percent but may be as steep as 70 percent. The soils associated with the Shallow Limy ecological site are shallow to very shallow to bedrock. Surface textures are primarily silty clay loam and silt loam. These somewhat excessively drained soils formed in residuum weathered from calcareous silty shales and limestone. The vegetation of the Reference Community is mixed grass prairie. The primary grasses include big bluestem, little bluestem, and sideoats grama. Secondary grasses include switchgrass, Indiangrass, and blue grama. Forbs are common and diverse. Vegetative production is lower on the Shallow Limy ecological site than that of associated upland sites due to the proximity of bedrock to the soil surface. This site is more intact than many other upland sites within the MLRA as it is better suited to grazing than to farming due to the shallowness of the site.

Associated sites

R106XY074NE	Clayey Upland The Clayey Upland ecological site is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy site.
R106XY075NE	Loamy Upland The Loamy Upland ecological site is often located adjacent to the Shallow Limy site.

R106XY074NE

Clayey Upland

The Clayey Upland ecological site is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy site.

R106XY075NE

Loamy Upland

The Loamy Upland ecological site is often located adjacent to the Shallow Limy site.

Similar sites

R106XY074NE	Clayey Upland The Clayey Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. Clayey Upland sites are moderately deep to very deep and are not calcareous near the surface while Shallow Limy sites are calcareous at or near the surface and bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface.
R106XY076NE	Limy Upland The Limy Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. While both sites are calcareous at or near the surface, Limy Upland sites are very deep while bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface on Shallow Limy sites.
R106XY075NE	Loamy Upland The Loamy Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. Loamy Upland sites are deep to very deep and are not calcareous near the surface while Shallow Limy sites are calcareous at or near the surface and bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface.

R106XY074NE

Clayey Upland

The Clayey Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. Clayey Upland sites are moderately deep to very deep and are not calcareous near the surface while Shallow Limy sites are calcareous at or near the surface and bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface.

R106XY076NE

Limy Upland

The Limy Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. While both sites are calcareous at or near the surface, Limy Upland sites are very deep while bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface on Shallow Limy sites.

R106XY075NE

Loamy Upland

The Loamy Upland ecological site is an upland site that is often found adjacent to the Shallow Limy ecological site. Loamy Upland sites are deep to very deep and are not calcareous near the surface while Shallow Limy sites are calcareous at or near the surface and bedrock is within 20 inches of the surface.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	Not specified
Herbaceous	(1) Andropogon gerardii (2) Schizachyrium scoparium

Download full description

Physiographic features

The Shallow Limy ecological site occurs on nearly level to steeply sloping uplands, often on rock outcrops between overlaying loess deposits. While slopes typically range from 3 to 20 percent, inclines of up to 70 percent have been recorded. The extreme depth to the water table dictate that the associated vegetative communities rely solely on precipitation water.

Figure 2.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Upland > Hillslope
Runoff class	Medium to high
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	730 – 2,000 ft
Slope	3 – 70%
Water table depth	72 in
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Climatic features

Like most Great Plains landscapes, the climate in this MLRA is under the sway of the continental effect. This creates a regime of extremes, with summer highs often in the triple digits and winter lows plunging well below zero. Blizzards can occur anytime between early fall and late spring, dropping the temperature more than 50 degrees in just a few hours. These events can pile up several feet of snow, often driven by winds in excess of 50 miles an hour. The resulting huge snow drifts can cause serious hardship for livestock, wildlife, and humans. Winters can be open, with bare ground for most of the season, or closed, with several feet of snow persisting until March. Most winters have a number of warm days interspersed with dropping temperatures, usually associated with approaching cold fronts. Spring brings violent thunderstorms, hail, and high winds. Tornadoes occur frequently.

About three-fourths of the precipitation falls as high intensity, convective thunderstorms from late spring through early autumn. The average annual precipitation gradient trends higher from northwest (28”) to southeast (40”), and the average annual temperature gradient trends higher from north (50°F) to south (55°F). Daily winds range from an average of 14 miles per hour during the spring to 11 miles per hour during the late summer. Occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts to more than 80 miles per hour.

Native cool season plants begin growth in early April and continue to about mid-June. Native warm season plants begin growth in early June and continue to early August. Green up of cool season plants may occur in September and October.

Table 3. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	136-148 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	160-188 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	31-38 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	129-153 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	154-190 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	29-40 in
Frost-free period (average)	142 days
Freeze-free period (average)	172 days
Precipitation total (average)	34 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 5. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 6. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 7. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 8. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) PERRY LAKE [USC00146333], Perry, KS
(2) BEATRICE 1N [USC00250622], Beatrice, NE
(3) CRETE [USC00252020], Crete, NE
(4) SYRACUSE [USC00258395], Syracuse, NE
(5) TABLE ROCK 4 N [USC00258410], Table Rock, NE
(6) ASHLAND NO 2 [USC00250375], Ashland, NE
(7) MEAD 6S [USC00255362], Ithaca, NE
(8) RAYMOND 2NE [USC00257055], Raymond, NE
(9) VIRGINIA [USC00258875], Virginia, NE
(10) LINCOLN MUNI AP [USW00014939], Lincoln, NE
(11) LINCOLN UNIV PWR PLT [USW00014971], Lincoln, NE
(12) CLINTON LAKE [USC00141612], Lawrence, KS
(13) HIAWATHA 9 ESE [USC00143634], Robinson, KS
(14) LAWRENCE [USC00144559], Lawrence, KS
(15) OSKALOOSA 4 NE [USC00146100], Mc Louth, KS
(16) PAWNEE CITY [USC00256570], Pawnee City, NE
(17) WAHOO [USC00258905], Wahoo, NE
(18) FALLS CITY BRENNER FLD [USW00094957], Falls City, NE
(19) BONNER SPRINGS [USC00140957], Bonner Springs, KS
(20) CENTRALIA [USC00141408], Centralia, KS
(21) HOLTON [USC00143759], Holton, KS
(22) HORTON [USC00143810], Horton, KS
(23) MARYSVILLE [USC00145063], Marysville, KS
(24) TECUMSEH 1S [USC00258465], Tecumseh, NE
(25) WEEPING WATER [USC00259090], Weeping Water, NE
(26) TOPEKA MUNI AP [USW00013996], Topeka, KS

Soil features

The soils associated with the Shallow Limy ecological site are located on uplands. Slopes typically range from 6 to 40 percent but may be up to 70 percent. These soils formed in residuum weathered from calcareous silty shales and from limestone. Soils are shallow and very shallow, somewhat excessively drained, typically with silty clay loam or silt loam surface textures. In the particle size control section, the weighted average of the clay content ranges from 15 to 35 percent, while that of the sand normally ranges from 2 to 15 percent. The saturated hydraulic conductivity rating is moderately high, and para lithic or lithic contact usually occurs in the top 20 inches of the soil.

Kipson, Sogn, and Bendena are the major soil series associated with this ecological site. Additional information can be found in the various soil survey reports. Contact the local USDA Service Center for soil survey reports that include more detail specific to your location or visit Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov).

Figure 9. Sogn series profile

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Residuum – limestone and shale
Surface texture	(1) Silty clay loam (2) Silt loam
Drainage class	Somewhat excessively drained
Permeability class	Very slow
Depth to restrictive layer	4 – 20 in
Soil depth	4 – 20 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	2 – 6%
Available water capacity (0-20in)	0.7 – 4.5 in
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-20in)	60%
Electrical conductivity (0-20in)	2 mmhos/cm
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-20in)	Not specified
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in)	6.1 – 8.4
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in)	14%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in)	1 – 8%

Ecological dynamics

the Shallow Limy ecological site developed under Central Great Plains climatic conditions, light to severe grazing by bison and other large herbivores, sporadic natural or human caused wildfires, and other biotic and abiotic factors which typically influence soil/site development. This continues to be a disturbance driven site, by herbivory, fire, and variable climate. Changes occur in the plant communities due to weather variations, impacts of native and/or exotic plant and animal species, and management actions.

One of the primary impacts to this site introduced by European settlers is season long continuous grazing by domestic livestock. This management practice causes the repeated removal of the growing point and excessive defoliation of the leaf area of individual warm season tall grasses. The resulting reduction of the ability of the plants to harvest sunlight depletes the root reserves, subsequently decreasing the root mass. This negatively impacts the ability of the plants to compete for life sustaining nutrients, resulting in declining vigor and eventual mortality. The space created in the vegetative community is then occupied by a species that evades the negative grazing impacts by a growing season adaptation such as a cool season, shorter structure, or reduced palatability mechanism.

The State and Transition Model (STM) is depicted following this section and includes a Reference State (1), a Native/Invaded State (2), and an Invaded Woody State (3). Each state represents the crossing of a major ecological threshold due to alteration of the functional dynamic properties of the ecosystem. The main properties observed to determine this change are the soil and vegetative communities and the hydrologic cycle. The STM illustrates the common plant communities that can occur on the site and the transition pathways between communities (Bestelmeyer, 2010). The ecological processes will be discussed in more detail in the plant community descriptions following the diagram.

Each state may have one or more vegetative communities which fluctuate in species composition and abundance within the normal parameters of the state. Within each state, communities may degrade or recover in response to natural and human caused disturbances such as variation in the degree and timing of herbivory, presence or absence of fire, and climatic and local fluctuations in the precipitation regime.

Interpretations are primarily based on the Reference State and have been determined by study of rangeland relic areas, areas protected from excessive disturbance, and areas under long term rotational grazing regimes. Trends in plant community dynamics have been interpreted from heavily to lightly grazed areas, seasonal use pastures, and historical accounts. Plant communities, states, transitional pathways, and thresholds have been determined through similar studies and experience.

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Native/Invaded Grass State

3. Invaded Woody State

T1A	-	Heavy grazing or haying with inadequate growing season recovery periods.
T1B	-	Woody encroachment and no fire or woody species management.
T2A	-	Woody encroachment and no fire or woody species management.
R3A	-	Prescribed burning, wildfire, timber harvest, and brush management.
R3B	-	Prescribed burning, wildfire, timber harvest, and brush management.

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Reference Community

1.2. Degraded Native Grass Community

1.3. At-Risk Community

1.4. Excessive Litter Community

1.1A	-	Continuous season long grazing or rotational grazing with inadequate growing season recovery time.
1.1B	-	Prolonged absence (>5 years) of herbivory and fire.
1.2A	-	Prescribed grazing during the cool season portion of the growing season.
1.2B	-	Continued season long grazing or rotational grazing or haying with inadequate, growing season recovery periods.
1.2C	-	Prolonged absence (>5 years) of herbivory and fire.
1.3A	-	Prescribed grazing with high intensity grazing during the early and late portions of the growing season.
1.3B	-	Prolonged absence (>5 years) of herbivory and fire.
1.4A	-	Reintroduction of herbivory and fire.
1.4B	-	Reintroduction of herbivory and fire.
1.4C	-	Reintroduction of herbivory and fire.

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Shortgrass Sod/Invaded Grass Community

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Invaded Woody Community

State 1
Reference State

The Reference State (1) describes the range of vegetative community phases that occur on the Shallow Limy ecological site where the natural processes are mostly intact. The Reference Community (1.1) is a representation of the native plant community phase that occupies a site that has been minimally altered by management. The Degraded Native Grass (1.2), the At-Risk (1.3), and the Excessive Litter (1.4) Communities are the phases that result from management decisions that are unfavorable for a healthy Reference Community (1.1). High perennial grass cover and production allows for increased soil moisture retention, vegetative production, and overall soil quality.

Dominant plant species

big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), grass

Community 1.1
Reference Community

Figure 10. Shallow Limy ecological site Reference Community (1.1) in Douglas County, Kansas MLRA 106.

The Reference Community or Native Mixedgrass Prairie Community (1.1) is dominated by warm-season, tall and mid grass native prairie species. This community serves as a description of the native plant community that naturally occurs on the site when the natural disturbance regimes are intact or closely mimicked by management practices. This phase is dynamic with fluid relative abundance and spatial boundaries between the dominant structural vegetative groups. These fluctuations are primarily driven by different responses of the species to changes in precipitation timing and abundance, and to fire and grazing events. The potential vegetation consists of approximately 80 to 90 percent grasses and grass-likes, 5 to 10 percent forbs, and 0 to 10 percent shrubs. Big and little bluestem and sideoats grama are the primary species in this community. Secondary species include switchgrass, Indiangrass, and blue grama. The site has a diverse forb population. This plant community is less productive than similar upland sites, and species diversity is limited as well. It is a resilient community, and resistant to short term stresses such as drought and short periods of heavy stocking. The well-developed root systems support this resiliency when allowed adequate recovery periods between grazing events. When exposed to long term or frequent overgrazing events without adequate rest, this plant community will degrade. The annual vegetative production of this community averages about 2,400 lbs. per acre.

Dominant plant species

big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), grass

Figure 11. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 5. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (lb/acre)	Representative value (lb/acre)	High (lb/acre)
Grass/Grasslike	1500	2040	2690
Shrub/Vine	45	180	275
Forb	105	180	275
Total	1650	2400	3240

Figure 12. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NE1061, Mid and Tall Warm Season Grasses. This plant community is dominated by warm-season, tall and midgrasses in MLRA 106.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
0	0	0	5	25	35	20	10	5	0	0	0

Community 1.2
Degraded Native Grass Community

Figure 13. Shallow Limy ecological site, Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2), Marshall County, Kansas, MLRA 106.

In the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) big bluestem, little bluestem, and sideoats grama lose productive capacity through loss of vigor and reproductive potential. Switchgrass and Indiangrass are significantly reduced, and forb diversity is reduced. Sideoats grama and little bluestem are still the dominant grasses but as growing season defoliation continues, there is an increase in the warm-season short grass species, such as blue and hairy grama, and tall dropseed. This community phase signals a significant loss of production. The change is due to continuous season long grazing with inadequate recovery periods. Warm-season short grasses and cool-season grasses increase, and Kentucky bluegrass or other non-native cool-season grasses begin to invade the plant community. The composition of the forb component favors less palatable species and the potential for encroachment by invasive woody species becomes more likely. Fewer high biomass producing deep rooted species result in a reduced fire friendly fuel load. While this plant community is less productive and less diverse than the representative plant community, it remains sustainable in regard to site/soil stability, hydrologic function, and biotic integrity.

Dominant plant species

sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass

Community 1.3
At-Risk Community

Figure 14. Shallow Limy ecological site, At-Risk Community (1.3), Pawnee County, Nebraska, MLRA 106.

In the At-Risk Community (1.3) the more palatable warm-season tall grasses have been reduced to a minor component of the plant community due to continued defoliation during their critical growth periods. Warm-season short grasses and cool-season grasses have increased significantly. Sideoats grama, tall dropseed, and warm-season short grasses are dominant. Nonnative grasses including Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, or tall fescue are present in the community at a minor level. Soil health is affected by reduced efficiency in the nutrient, mineral, and hydrologic cycles as a result of decreases in plant litter and rooting depths. This may result in formation of a compacted layer in the soil, and total annual vegetative production declines significantly. Without a management change, this community is at risk to degrade to the Native/Invaded Grass State (2).

Dominant plant species

sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), grass
blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass
composite dropseed (Sporobolus compositus), grass

Figure 15. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NE1069, MLRA 106 Warm/cool-season mix.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
0	1	4	10	23	26	17	8	6	4	1	0

Community 1.4
Excessive Litter Community

The Excessive Litter Community (1.4) develops when the natural disturbances of herbivory and fire are removed from the system for extended periods of time (five years or more). Litter significantly exceeds the amount expected on the site and the species present can tolerate a thatch layer. Individual plants tend to be clumped and there is an excessive amount of litter. Species that cannot tolerate an extensive litter layer have low vigor and reduced productivity. Once the undisturbed litter layer develops to a certain level, a significant amount of precipitation is held in this layer increasing evaporation, limiting soil available moisture, and simulating drought conditions. If herbivory or fire are not reintroduced, the plant community will experience a significant amount of death loss.

Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2

Reference Community

Degraded Native Grass Community

A shift from the Reference Community (1.1) to the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) occurs with continuous, season long grazing or with rotational grazing with inadequate recovery periods (deferment) during the growing season. Repeated haying without adequate growing season recovery will also cause this shift.

Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.4

Prolonged interruption (greater than five years) of the natural disturbances of herbivory and fire will convert the Reference Community (1.1) to the Excessive Litter Community (1.4).

Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

Degraded Native Grass Community

Reference Community

A shift from the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) toward the Reference Community (1.1) can be achieved through implementation of prescribed grazing. Implementing a grazing strategy that incorporates recovery periods during the growing season that allows the native, warm-season tall grasses adequate time to recover from defoliation will facilitate this shift. Appropriately timed prescribed fire will accelerate this process.

Conservation practices

Prescribed Burning
Prescribed Grazing

Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.3

Degraded Native Grass Community

At-Risk Community

Continued season long grazing or rotational grazing or haying with inadequate recovery periods during the growing season degrades the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) to the At-Risk Community (1.3).

Pathway 1.2C
Community 1.2 to 1.4

Prolonged (greater than 5 years) interruption of the natural disturbances of herbivory and fire will convert the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) to the Excessive Litter Community (1.4).

Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.2

At-Risk Community

Degraded Native Grass Community

The At-Risk Community (1.3) can be shifted to the Degraded Native Grass Community (1.2) with prescribed grazing early and late in the growing season to reduce cool-season grass component. Targeting the peak growth period of cool-season grasses with high intensity grazing events followed by rest will allow the native, warm-season tall and mid grasses to rejuvenate. Appropriately timed prescribed fire will accelerate this process.

Conservation practices

Prescribed Burning
Prescribed Grazing

Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.4

Prolonged interruption (greater than five years) of the natural disturbances of herbivory and fire will convert the At-Risk Community (1.3) to the Excessive Litter Community (1.4).

Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1

Reintroduction of the natural processes of herbivory and fire through implementation of prescribed grazing and prescribed burning, will return the Excessive Litter Community (1.4) to the Reference Community (1.1).

Conservation practices

Prescribed Burning
Prescribed Grazing

Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.2

Conservation practices

Prescribed Burning
Prescribed Grazing

Pathway 1.4C
Community 1.4 to 1.3

Conservation practices

Prescribed Burning
Prescribed Grazing

State 2
Native/Invaded Grass State

The Native/Invaded Grass State (2) exhibits a co-dominance of both native and introduced species. Native, warm-season tall grasses, such as big bluestem and Indiangrass, may be present as trace functional group. The plant community consists of the more grazing tolerant native species and a significant component of introduced, cool-season grasses such as smooth brome, tall fescue, and Kentucky bluegrass. Forb diversity is limited to species with low palatability. Plant diversity is low. The Shortgrass Sod/Invaded Grass Community (2.1) is the component of the Native/Invaded Grass State (2). The loss of warm-season, tall and mid grasses has negatively impacted energy flow and nutrient cycling. Water infiltration is reduced due to the shallow root system and rapid runoff characteristics of the grazing evasive plant communities. Impaired energy capture and altered hydrologic function are reflected in reduced vegetative productivity, shallower rooting depth and degraded soil quality. Continuous and heavy grazing pressure will maintain this plant community in a sod bound condition. Grazing management practices that allow for adequate periods of recovery between grazing events and grazing timed early and late during the growing season will reduce the vigor of the nonnative cool-season grasses and may allow the warm-season tall and mid grasses to increase in abundance and productivity. Return to the Reference State (1) is unlikely due to the loss of plant diversity, overall soil disturbance, and alterations to hydrology.

Dominant plant species

blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass
hairy grama (Bouteloua hirsuta), grass
composite dropseed (Sporobolus compositus), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
smooth brome (Bromus inermis), grass
tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass

Community 2.1
Shortgrass Sod/Invaded Grass Community

The Shortgrass Sod/Invaded Grass Community (2.1) represents a shift from the Reference State (1) across a plant community threshold. With continued grazing pressure, blue grama, hairy grama, composite dropseed, annual bromes, and Kentucky bluegrass will become the dominant plant species. Trace remnants of the more palatable warm-season grasses such as little bluestem and sideoats grama may remain. Smooth brome or tall fescue may invade the site. As grazing pressure continues, these grasses may dominate the site. Continuous and heavy grazing pressure will maintain this plant community in a sod bound condition. Forb richness and diversity will decrease. In the areas with deeper soils, with the decline and loss of deeper penetrating root systems, a compacted layer (or pan) may form in the soil profile below the shallower replacement root systems.

Dominant plant species

blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass
hairy grama (Bouteloua hirsuta), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass

Figure 16. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NE1067, Nebraska and Kansas Loess Drift Hills. Invaded cool season dominant.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
0	0	5	13	28	28	12	5	6	3	0	0

State 3
Invaded Woody State

The Invaded Woody State (3) is the result of woody encroachment. Once the tree canopy cover reaches 15 percent with an average tree height exceeding five feet, the threshold is crossed. Woody species are encroaching due to lack of prescribed fire and other brush management practices. Typical ecological impacts are a loss of native grasses, degraded forage productivity, and reduced soil quality. This state consists of the Invaded Woody Community (3.1). Prescribed burning, wildfire, timber harvest and brush management will move this state toward a grass dominated state. If the Invaded Woody State (3) transitioned from the Native/Invaded Grass State (2), the land cannot be restored to the Reference State (1) as the native plant community, soils, and hydrologic function had been too severely impacted prior to the woody encroachment to allow restoration to the Reference State (1).

Dominant plant species

eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
roughleaf dogwood (Cornus drummondii), tree
smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), shrub
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass

Community 3.1
Invaded Woody Community

Figure 17. Post-treatment mortality of invading eastern redcedar following a prescribed burn.

The Invaded Woody Community (3.1) has at least 15 percent canopy cover consisting of trees generally 5 feet or taller and shrubs. Roughleaf dogwood, smooth sumac and honey locust are some of the deciduous invaders, while eastern red cedar is the primary coniferous encroacher. Cedars can eventually dominate the site, resulting in a closed canopy monoculture, which drastically reduces forage production and has limited value for either livestock grazing or wildlife habitat. In the absence of fire and brush management, this ecological site is very susceptible to eastern red cedar seedling invasion, especially when adjacent to a seed source. Eastern red cedar can eventually dominate the site resulting in a closed canopy monoculture which drastically reduces forage production, and which has limited value for either livestock grazing or wildlife habitat. Due to fire suppression over many years, this plant community will develop extensive ladder fuels which can lead to a removal of most tree species with a wildfire. The herbaceous component decreases proportionately in relation to the percent canopy cover, with the reduction being greater under a conifer overstory. Eastern red cedar control can usually be accomplished with prescribed burning while the trees are six feet tall or less and fine fuel production is greater than 1,500 pounds per acres. Larger red cedars can also be controlled with prescribed burning, but successful application requires the use of specifically designed ignition and holding techniques (https://www.loesscanyonsburngroup.com). Resprouting brush and trees such as honey locust, smooth sumac, and Siberian elm must be chemically treated immediately after mechanical removal to achieve effective treatment. The forb component will initially increase following tree removal. To prevent return to a woody dominated community, ongoing brush management such as hand cutting, chemical spot treatments, or periodic prescribed burning is required. This plant community is resistant to change and resilient given normal disturbances. In higher canopy cover situations, the soil erosion will increase in relation to most of the plant communities from which this plant community originated. The water cycle is also significantly altered under higher canopy cover. Infiltration is reduced and runoff is typically increased because of a lack of herbaceous cover and the rooting structure provided by the herbaceous species. Total annual production during an average year varies significantly, depending on the production level prior to encroachment and the percentage of canopy cover.

Dominant plant species

eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), tree
honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos), tree
roughleaf dogwood (Cornus drummondii), tree
smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), shrub
blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

Heavy grazing or haying with inadequate growing season recovery periods (deferment) will cause the Reference State (1) to lose a significant proportion of warm-season, tall and mid grass species and cross a threshold to the Native/Invaded Grass State (2). Water infiltration and other hydrologic functions will be reduced due to the root matting presence of sod forming grasses. With the decline and loss of deeper penetrating root systems, soil structure and biological integrity are catastrophically degraded to the point that recovery is unlikely. Once this occurs, it is highly unlikely that grazing management alone will return the community to the Reference State (1).

Transition T1B
State 1 to 3

Disruption of natural fire regime and encroachment of exotic and invasive native woody species with no woody species management will cause the Reference State (1) to shift to the Invaded Woody State (3).

Transition T2A
State 2 to 3

Disruption of natural fire regime and encroachment of exotic and invasive native woody species will shift the Native/Invaded Grass State (2) to the Invaded Woody State (3).

Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1

Prescribed burning, wildfire, timber harvest, and brush management will move the Invaded Woody State (3) toward the Reference State (1). The forb component of a site with heavy tree density or canopy cover may initially increase following tree removal through mechanical brush management treatments and prescribed fire. If resprouting brush is present, stumps must be chemically treated immediately after mechanical removal. Ongoing brush management such as hand cutting, chemical spot treatments, or periodic prescribed burning is required to prevent a return to the Invaded Woody State (4). Land that transitioned to the Invaded Woody State (4) from the Native/Invaded Grass State (2) cannot be restored to the Reference State (1) through removal of woody species.

Conservation practices

Brush Management
Prescribed Burning

Restoration pathway R3B
State 3 to 2

Prescribed burning, wildfire, timber harvest, and brush management will move the Invaded Woody State (3) toward the Native/Invaded Grass State (2). The forb component of a site with heavy tree density or canopy cover may initially increase following tree removal through mechanical brush management treatments and prescribed fire. If resprouting brush is present, stumps must be chemically treated immediately after mechanical removal. Ongoing brush management such as hand cutting, chemical spot treatments, or periodic prescribed burning is required to prevent a return to the Invaded Woody State (4). Land that transitioned to the Invaded Woody State (4) from the Native/Invaded Grass State (2) cannot be restored to the Reference State (1) through removal of woody species.

Conservation practices

Brush Management
Prescribed Burning

Additional community tables

Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production (lb/acre)	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1	Warm-Season Tallgrass			960–1440
	big bluestem	ANGE	Andropogon gerardii	720–1200	–
	switchgrass	PAVI2	Panicum virgatum	24–240	–
	Indiangrass	SONU2	Sorghastrum nutans	24–240	–
	silver beardgrass	BOLAT	Bothriochloa laguroides ssp. torreyana	0–120	–
1	Warm-Season Midgrass			720–960
	little bluestem	SCSC	Schizachyrium scoparium	360–840	–
	sideoats grama	BOCU	Bouteloua curtipendula	360–600	–
	purple lovegrass	ERSP	Eragrostis spectabilis	0–120	–
	composite dropseed	SPCO16	Sporobolus compositus	0–120	–
1	Warm-Season Shortgrass			72–120
	blue grama	BOGR2	Bouteloua gracilis	72–120	–
	hairy grama	BOHI2	Bouteloua hirsuta	0–120	–
	buffalograss	BODA2	Bouteloua dactyloides	0–72	–
2	Cool-Season Grasses			24–240
	porcupinegrass	HESP11	Hesperostipa spartea	0–120	–
	prairie Junegrass	KOMA	Koeleria macrantha	0–120	–
	Scribner's rosette grass	DIOLS	Dichanthelium oligosanthes var. scribnerianum	0–120	–
	Canada wildrye	ELCA4	Elymus canadensis	0–120	–
	western wheatgrass	PASM	Pascopyrum smithii	0–120	–
	Virginia wildrye	ELVI3	Elymus virginicus	0–72	–
	needle and thread	HECO26	Hesperostipa comata	0–72	–
	green needlegrass	NAVI4	Nassella viridula	0–48	–
3	Grasslikes			0–120
	sedge	CAREX	Carex	0–120	–
Forb
4	Forbs			120–240
	Cuman ragweed	AMPS	Ambrosia psilostachya	0–72	–
	white sagebrush	ARLU	Artemisia ludoviciana	0–48	–
	purple prairie clover	DAPU5	Dalea purpurea	0–48	–
	blacksamson echinacea	ECAN2	Echinacea angustifolia	0–24	–
	scarlet beeblossom	GACO5	Gaura coccinea	0–24	–
	rose mock vervain	GLCA2	Glandularia canadensis	0–24	–
	willowleaf sunflower	HESA2	Helianthus salicifolius	0–24	–
	hairy false goldenaster	HEVI4	Heterotheca villosa	0–24	–
	dotted blazing star	LIPU	Liatris punctata	0–24	–
	Nuttall's sensitive-briar	MINU6	Mimosa nuttallii	0–24	–
	evening primrose	OENOT	Oenothera	0–24	–
	stiff goldenrod	OLRI	Oligoneuron rigidum	0–24	–
	smooth forked nailwort	PACA11	Paronychia canadensis	0–24	–
	prairie groundsel	PAPL12	Packera plattensis	0–24	–
	white prairie clover	DACA7	Dalea candida	0–24	–
	field pussytoes	ANNE	Antennaria neglecta	0–24	–
	western yarrow	ACMIO	Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis	0–24	–
	silverleaf Indian breadroot	PEAR6	Pediomelum argophyllum	0–24	–
	cobaea beardtongue	PECO4	Penstemon cobaea	0–24	–
	large Indian breadroot	PEES	Pediomelum esculentum	0–24	–
	large beardtongue	PEGR7	Penstemon grandiflorus	0–24	–
	slimflower scurfpea	PSTE5	Psoralidium tenuiflorum	0–24	–
	upright prairie coneflower	RACO3	Ratibida columnifera	0–24	–
	compassplant	SILA3	Silphium laciniatum	0–24	–
	Missouri goldenrod	SOMI2	Solidago missouriensis	0–24	–
	white heath aster	SYER	Symphyotrichum ericoides	0–24	–
	aromatic aster	SYOB	Symphyotrichum oblongifolium	0–24	–
	longbract spiderwort	TRBR	Tradescantia bracteata	0–24	–
	nettleleaf noseburn	TRUR2	Tragia urticifolia	0–24	–
	hoary verbena	VEST	Verbena stricta	0–24	–
Shrub/Vine
5	Shrubs			48–240
	leadplant	AMCA6	Amorpha canescens	0–120	–
	smooth sumac	RHGL	Rhus glabra	0–120	–
	prairie rose	ROAR3	Rosa arkansana	0–72	–
	western snowberry	SYOC	Symphoricarpos occidentalis	0–72	–
	Jersey tea	CEHE	Ceanothus herbaceus	0–72	–
	pricklypear	OPUNT	Opuntia	0–48	–
	coralberry	SYOR	Symphoricarpos orbiculatus	0–48	–
	fragrant sumac	RHAR4	Rhus aromatica	0–24	–

Interpretations

Animal community

LIVESTOCK – GRAZING INTERPRETATIONS:
Grazing by domestic livestock is one of the major income producing industries in the area. Rangeland in this area may provide yearlong forage for cattle, sheep, or horses. During the dormant period, the protein levels of the forage may be lower than the minimum needed to meet livestock (primarily cattle and sheep) requirements. The following table lists suggested stocking rates for cattle under continuous season long grazing under normal growing conditions. These are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Often, the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community (as described in this ecological site description). Because of this, a field visit is recommended, in all cases, to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using this information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. With consultation of the land manager, more intensive grazing management may result in improved harvest efficiencies and increased carrying capacity.

Production and Carrying Capacity*
Community 1.1, Reference Community (Big Bluestem-Little Bluestem Community): 2,400 lbs/acre, 0.76 AUM/acre

*Based upon the following conditions: continuous season long grazing with cattle under average growing conditions, 25 percent harvest efficiency. Air dry forage requirements are based on 3 percent of animal body weight or 790 lbs per animal unit (AU) per month (M). An AU is generally one mature cow of approximately 1,000 pounds and a calf as old as 6 months or their equivalent.

WILDLIFE INTERPRETATIONS:
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 106 lies primarily within the tall grass prairie ecosystem. Prior to European settlement of North America, this area consisted of diverse grassland habitats interspersed with varying densities of depressional wetlands and limited woody riparian corridors. These habitats provided critical life cycle components for the grassland birds, prairie dogs, and herds of roaming bison, elk, and pronghorn that historically occupied this landscape. Diverse populations of small mammals and insects provided a bountiful prey base for raptors and omnivores such as coyotes, foxes, raccoons, and opossums. Bobcats, wolves, and mountain lions occupied the apex predator niche. In addition, a wide variety of reptiles and amphibians thrived in this landscape.

The tall grass prairie was a disturbance driven ecosystem with fire, herbivory, and climate functioning as the primary disturbances. Following European settlement of North America, elimination of fire, widespread conversion to cropland, and other sources of habitat fragmentation significantly altered the appearance and functionality of the entire ecosystem. The reduced stability of the system is reflected by major changes in the composition and abundance of the native flora and fauna. Introduced and invading species further degrade the ecological integrity of the plant and animal communities. Bison and prairie dogs were historically keystone species, but free roaming bison herds and nearly all prairie dogs have been extirpated in this region. The loss of bison and fire as ecological drivers greatly influenced the character of the remaining native grasslands and the habitats they provide.

Historically, an ecological mosaic of the sites provided habitat for species requiring unfragmented grasslands. Important habitat features and components found commonly or exclusively on modern day remnants include upland nesting habitat for grassland birds and game birds; nesting and escape cover for waterfowl; forbs and insects for brood rearing habitat; and a forage source for small and large herbivores. Fragmentation has reduced habitat quality for numerous area sensitive species, as highlighted by the decline of the greater prairie chicken. Grassland nesting bird populations such as dickcissel and Henslow's sparrow are also declining. In this fragmented landscape, native grassland bird populations face increasing competition from the opportunistic European starlings and house sparrows and are subject to nest parasitism from brown headed cowbirds. Tree encroachment creates habitat that favors generalist species such as American robin and mourning dove, and provides perches for raptors, increasing the predation mortality. Introduced species such as smooth bromegrass, reed canarygrass, Kentucky bluegrass, nodding plumeless thistle (musk thistle), and Canada thistle further degrade the biological integrity of many of these remnant prairies.

1. REFERENCE STATE: The predominance of tall and mid grasses and forbs in this community makes it ideal for grazers and mixed feeders. Pollinating insects play a significant role in maintaining the forb community and provide a food source for grassland birds and other grassland dependent species. The vegetative structural diversity provides habitat for reptiles, amphibians, and a wide array of native and introduced bird species. The abundant prey base supports populations of Swainson’s hawk, short eared and great horned owls, and other grassland raptors. The grasses, forbs, and shrubs provide high nutrition levels for small and large herbivores including moles, mice, ground squirrels, and white-tailed deer. The structure of this plant community provides suitable thermal, protective, and escape cover for small herbivores and grassland birds. Many wide-ranging predators utilize this plant community, including coyote, badger, red fox, and least and long tailed weasels. As the plant community degrades to more mid grasses and fewer tall grasses, less winter and escape cover are provided. It also provides less cover for predators.

Hydrological functions

The soil series associated with the Limy Upland site have medium to very high runoff and are rated as hydrologic class D.

Recreational uses

This site provides hunting for upland game species and white-tailed deer, along with hiking, photography, and bird watching. The wide varieties of plants which bloom from spring until fall have an aesthetic value that appeals to visitors.

Wood products

None.

Other products

None of significance

Other information

Site Development and Testing Plan:
Additional data collection and evaluation may be needed to develop this ESD to the Correlated level. This could include field activities to collect medium, and high intensity sampling, soil correlations, and analysis of that data. Field reviews of the project plan should be done by soil scientists and vegetation specialists. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD will be needed to produce the final document.

Supporting information

Inventory data references

The inventory data consists of three 417s and one NRI data point, as well as additional recent and historical data collection. These data sets are supplemented by expert opinions from resource professionals.

Sample ID
Data source Number Year State code County code State County
R-417 0038320085 1983 20 085 Kansas Jackson
0018531097 1985 31 097 Nebraska Johnson
0118031133 1980 31 133 Nebraska Pawnee

Other references

Harms, R. 2009. Recovery Outline for the Salt Creek tiger beetle (Cicindela nevadica lincolniana). Available online. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/invertebrates/saltcreektiger/FinalRecoveryOutlineFeb2009.pdf. Accessed 1/02/2018.

High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska. Available online. http://hpcc.unl.edu. Accessed 12/05/16.

Johnsgaard, P.A. 2001. “The Nature of Nebraska.” University of Nebraska Press.

Muhs, Daniel R., E. Bettis III, J. Aleinikoff, J. McGeehin, J. Beann, G. Skipp, B. Marshall, H. Roberts, W. Johnson, and R. Benton. "Origin and paleoclimatic significance of late Quaternary loess in Nebraska: Evidence from stratigraphy, chronology, sedimentology, and geochemistry" (2008). USGS Staff —Published Research, Paper 162. Available online. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/162. Accessed 12/05/16.

Personal communications with professional ecologists and wildlife experts.

Rolfsmeier, S.B. and G. Steinauer. 2010. "Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska," (version IV). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program.

Spomer, S. and L. Higley. 2001. The Salt Creek Tiger Beetle. Bio-graphica International. Available online. http://drshigley.com/lgh/sctb/default.htm. Accessed 1/02/2018.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) National Ecological Site Handbook. Available online. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/soils/ref/?cid=nrcseprd1291232 Accessed January, 2014.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. NRCS National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. Available online. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?hid=21422. Accessed August, 2011.

USDA, NRCS. National Water and Climate Center, Portland, OR. Available online. http://wcc.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 12/05/16.

USDA, NRCS.1997. National Range and Pasture Handbook.

USDA, NRCS. National Soil Information System, Information Technology Center, Fort Collins, CO. Available online. http://nasis.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 12/05/16.

USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. Available online. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed 12/05/16.

USDA, NRCS Soil Surveys from: Butler, Saunders, Lancaster, Cass, Otoe, Nemaha, Johnson, Gage, Pawnee, Saline, Seward, Saunders, and Richardson Counties in Nebraska; and Atchison, Brown, Doniphan, Douglas, Franklin, Jackson, Jefferson, Johnson, Leavenworth, Marshall, Nemaha, Osage, Pottawatomie, Shawnee, Wabaunsee, Washington, and Wyandotte Counties in Kansas.

Contributors

Stu McFarland
Joseph May
Doug Whisenhunt
Nadine Bishop

Approval

Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 6/09/2025

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)	Original Authors: Joseph May and Doug Whisenhunt Version V Authors: Anna Ferguson, Aaron Hird, Justin Linder, Dusty Schwandt, Doug Spencer, Chris Tecklenburg, Nadine Bishop, Jeff Nichols
Contact for lead author	jeffrey.nichols@usda.gov
Date	11/30/2024
Approved by	Suzanne Mayne-Kinney
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production