Loamy Floodplain Prairie
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T1C More details
- Restoration pathway R2A More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Restoration pathway T4A More details
- Restoration pathway R4A More details
- Restoration pathway T5B More details
- Transition T5A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The reference plant community is categorized as a wet meadow community, dominated by hydrophytic and mesophytic vegetation. The three community phases within the reference state are dependent on seasonal flooding and precipitation as well as an average fire return interval of three years (LANDFIRE 2009; Nelson 2010). The amount and duration of floodwater alters species composition, cover, and extent, while regular fire intervals keep woody species from encroaching. Animal herbivory from large ungulates have more localized impacts in the reference phases, but do contribute to overall species composition, diversity, cover, and productivity (Nelson 2010).
Submodel
Description
Fire suppression can transition the reference herbaceous wet meadow community into a shrub-dominated community. Historically, hot replacement fires occurred on a two to five year cycle and helped to reduce woody encroachment and thatch build-up (LANDFIRE 2009). Over the past 150 years, however, fire suppression policies have allowed shrubs and trees to succeed into areas they did not historically occur.
Submodel
Description
The cool-season grassland state occurs when the reference state has been anthropogenically-altered for livestock and/or hay production. Interseeding of non-native cool-season grasses, annual mowing, and grazing by domesticated livestock transition and maintain this simplified grassland state. Over time, as lands were continually grazed by large herds of cattle, native plant species diversity decreases and the non-native species were able to spread and expand across the prairie habitat (Nelson 2010; Steinauer and Rolfsmeier 2010).
Submodel
Description
The Midwest is well-known for its highly-productive agricultural soils, and as a result, much of the MLRA has been converted to cropland, including portions of this ecological site (USGS 1999). Agricultural tile drains used to lower the water table and continuous use of tillage, row-crop planting, and chemicals (i.e., herbicides, fertilizers, etc.) have effectively eliminated the reference community and many of its natural ecological functions in favor of crop production. Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) are the dominant crops for the site. These areas are likely to remain in crop production for the foreseeable future.
Submodel
Description
Prairie reconstructions have become an important tool for repairing natural ecological functioning and providing habitat protection for numerous grassland-dependent species. The historic plant community of wet prairie was extremely diverse and complex, and prairie replication is not considered to be possible once the native vegetation has been altered by post-European settlement land uses. Therefore ecological restoration should aim to aid the recovery of degraded, damaged, or destroyed ecosystems. A successful restoration will have the ability to structurally and functionally sustain itself, demonstrate resilience to the natural ranges of stress and disturbance, and create and maintain positive biotic and abiotic interactions (SER 2002). The reconstructed wet prairie state is the result of a long-term commitment involving a multi-step, adaptive management process. Diverse, species-rich seed mixes are important to utilize as they allow the site to undergo successional stages that exhibit changing composition and dominance over time (Smith et al. 2010). On-going post-planting management will help the site progress from an early successional community dominated by annuals and some weeds to a later seral stage composed of native perennial grasses, sedges, and forbs.
Submodel
Mechanism
Transition 1A – Long-term fire suppression transitions this site to the fire-suppressed state (2).
Mechanism
Transition 1B – Interseeding of cool-season grasses and annual mowing and/or grazing transition this site to the cool-season grassland state (3).
Mechanism
Transition 1C – Installation of drain tiles, tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Restoration 2A – Re-establishment of a historic fire regime and non-native species control transitions this site to the reference state (1).
Mechanism
Transition 3A – Installation of drain tiles, tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Restoration 3A – Site preparation, exotic species control, native species seeding, and post-planting management transition this site to the reconstructed wet prairie state (5).
Mechanism
Transition 4A – Interseeding of cool-season grasses and annual mowing and/or grazing transition this site to the cool-season grassland state (3).
Mechanism
Restoration 4A – Removal of drain tiles, site preparation, native seeding, and invasive species control transition this site to the reconstructed wet prairie state (5).
Mechanism
Transition 5B – Uncontrolled reed canarygrass invasions transition this site to the cool-season grassland state (3).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.