Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F146XY034ME
Wet Sandy Bog
Last updated: 9/27/2024
Accessed: 11/23/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 146X–Aroostook Area
This area is entirely in Maine and it makes up about 1,275 square miles (3,305 square kilometers). Presque Isle is the largest city in the area. Interstate 95 ends in the town of Houlton, at the border with New Brunswick, Canada. Aroostook State Park, Fort Kent Historic Site, and Loring Commerce Center are in this area. The Big Rock ski area is in the middle of this MLRA and is on the highest point, which is Mars Hill Mountain.
Ecological site concept
This site occurs on gently-sloping, very-poorly drained glacial outwash deposits that are frequently ponded for much or all of the year. Soils are deep loams formed, often with a mucky peat surface layer. These saturated bog soils are acidic to very acidic with few rock fragments. The soil moisture regime is aquic and soil temperature regime is frigid.
This site receives significant inputs of run-in water from surrounding uplands. This results in year-round saturation, extended surface ponding, and ultimately acidification. These water features influence plant community structure and dynamics on this site.
Associated sites
F146XY021ME |
Marsh This site may grade into the Marsh site as soils become wetter. |
---|---|
F146XY033ME |
Wet Loamy Flat This site may grade into the Wet Loamy Flat site as soils become drier. |
Similar sites
F146XY033ME |
Wet Loamy Flat This site is similar to the Wet Loamy Flat, except it is wetter, more acidic, and supports primarily black spruce instead of red spruce and balsam fir |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
(1) Picea mariana |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Ilex mucronata |
Herbaceous |
(1) Osmunda cinnamomea |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on very-poorly drained glacial outwash deposits that are frequently ponded for much or all of the year. It occurs at elevations below 1500 feet, on very gentle slopes, less than three percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Outwash plain
(2) Outwash terrace |
---|---|
Runoff class | Negligible to low |
Ponding duration | Long (7 to 30 days) |
Ponding frequency | Frequent |
Elevation | 50 – 1,500 ft |
Slope | 3% |
Ponding depth | 6 in |
Water table depth |
Not specified |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate of this site is characterized by cold, snowy winters, and cool summers. Precipitation is nearly equally distributed throughout the year, with slightly more moisture falling in June-October. During winter months, and sometimes fall and spring, cold winds from the north bring severe weather events. The effects of a relatively short growing season are somewhat mitigated by long summer days associated with the high latitudes of the region. Occasionally high winds, microburst, or freezing rain events damage vegetation over small portions of the landscape.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 80-94 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 126-134 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 37-42 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 61-107 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 103-141 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 36-42 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 85 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 127 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 39 in |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) ALLAGASH [USC00170200], Saint Francis, ME
-
(2) BRIDGEWATER [USC00170833], Bridgewater, ME
-
(3) FT KENT [USC00172878], Fort Kent, ME
-
(4) HOULTON 5N [USC00173944], Houlton, ME
-
(5) PRESQUE ISLE [USC00176937], Presque Isle, ME
-
(6) CARIBOU MUNI AP [USW00014607], Caribou, ME
-
(7) HOULTON INTL AP [USW00014609], Houlton, ME
Influencing water features
This site receives significant inputs of run-in water from surrounding uplands. This results in year-round saturation, extended surface ponding, and ultimately acidification. These water features influence plant community structure and dynamics on this site.
Soil features
The soils of this site are deep, very poorly-drained loams formed in glacial outwash deposits. These saturated bog soils are acidic to very acidic with few rock fragments. The soil moisture regime is aquic and soil temperature regime is frigid.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Glaciofluvial deposits
–
granite
|
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Very poorly drained |
Permeability class | Moderately slow |
Soil depth | 65 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 1% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 1% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
4.4 – 8.4 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
Not specified |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
Not specified |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
3.6 – 5.3 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
2% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
20 – 25% |
Ecological dynamics
[Caveat: The vegetation information contained in this section and is only provisional, based on concepts, and future projects support validation through field work. *] The vegetation groupings described in this section are based on the terrestrial ecological system classification and vegetation associations developed by NatureServe (Comer 2003) and localized associations provided by the Maine Natural Areas Program (Gawler and Cutko, 2010).
Black spruce dominates the overstory, with diverse heath shrubs, herbs, and mosses dominating the understory and open patches. Increases in ponding depth due to beaver activity or man-made structures can cause mortality of these dominant species and a transition to a ponded, open wetland state. As ponding decreases to reference levels, this site may transition through a series of open wetland phases prior to re-establishment of reference state species.
Logging, insects (particularly spruce budworm), and windthrow may reduce overstory cover in patches. However, black spruce is expected to regain dominance on this site following these disturbances. In areas where this site is cleared and drained, hay, pasture, and sometimes crops may be cultivated with significant soil amendment.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State (minimally-managed)
This site occurs on gently-sloping, very-poorly drained glacial outwash deposits that are frequently ponded for much or all of the year. Soils are deep loams formed, often with a mucky peat surface layer. These saturated bog soils are acidic to very acidic with few rock fragments. The soil moisture regime is aquic and soil temperature regime is frigid. This site receives significant inputs of run-in water from surrounding uplands. This results in year-round saturation, extended surface ponding, and ultimately acidification. These water features influence plant community structure and dynamics on this site.
Community 1.1
Spruce - Larch Wooded Bog
Sites occur in a peatland setting, usually <1200’ elevation, characteristic of nutrient poor or highly acidic peatlands (pH 4.2-5.2). These bogs may occur as part of fens, especially in kettleholes, and are standard constituents of raised (ombrotrophic) bogs. This open canopy peatland type is characterized by black spruce and/or larch trees over typical bog vegetation of heath shrubs, graminoids, and peat mosses. It is the most common type of ‘forested bog’ in Maine. Canopy closure is usually 20-50% and occasionally ranges up to 85%. Black spruce is usually dominant, but in some cases larch (or rarely fir) may be more abundant. Red maple may be a component in somewhat more minerotrophic portions, and white pine may occur on hummocks. The shrub layer, including small trees, is usually well developed (>30% cover). The bryoid layer has close to 100% cover and is dominated by peat mosses. (Gawler and Cutko, 2010)
Resilience management. Maine Natural Areas Program State Rank: S4 Apparently Secure – At fairly low risk of extinction or elimination due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors. Black spruce bogs generally occur as part of larger peatlands. Maintaining the hydrologic integrity of the entire wetland with upland buffers is key. The trees mostly remain small and have limited economic use. Several known sites are in public ownership. (Gawler and Cutko, 2010)
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
European larch (Larix decidua), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
-
gray birch (Betula populifolia), tree
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
eastern white pine (Pinus strobus), tree
-
catberry (Ilex mucronata), shrub
-
rhodora (Rhododendron canadense), shrub
-
sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia), shrub
-
bog Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), shrub
-
black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata), shrub
-
velvetleaf huckleberry (Vaccinium myrtilloides), shrub
-
threeseeded sedge (Carex trisperma), grass
-
cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), other herbaceous
-
creeping snowberry (Gaultheria hispidula), other herbaceous
-
lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), other herbaceous
Dominant resource concerns
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Surface water depletion
-
Pesticides transported to surface water
-
Pesticides transported to ground water
-
Pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids, or compost applications transported to surface water
-
Pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids, or compost applications transported to ground water
-
Petroleum, heavy metals, and other pollutants transported to surface water
-
Petroleum, heavy metals, and other pollutants transported to ground water
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 1.2
Sheep Laurel Dwarf Shrub Bog
This type occurs within raised portions of peatlands, where ombrotrophic conditions prevail (plant growth is raised above the water table, and virtually all nutrients come from precipitation). Although standing water may not be visible, the peat is commonly saturated with water throughout most of the year. The substrate is highly acidic. A dense layer of dwarf heath shrubs dominates this prototypical open peatland community. Stunted and scattered black spruce and larch trees form <25% cover. Heath shrubs carpet the hummocks and hollows of the peat substrate. Sedges contribute little cover (usually <15%, occasionally 20-25%). The ground surface is covered by a spongy carpet of peat mosses. The floristic composition varies depending upon bog morphology and nutrient availability. (Gawler and Cutko, 2010) Maine Natural Areas Program State Rank: Secure – At very low risk or extinction or elimination due to a very extensive range, abundant populations or occurrences, and little to no concern from declines or threats.
Resilience management. Maine Natural Areas Program State Rank: S5 Secure – At very low risk or extinction or elimination due to a very extensive range, abundant populations or occurrences, and little to no concern from declines or threats. This community type is well represented in Maine and is fairly stable in extent, with many examples on public lands and private conservation lands. Peat harvesting is a direct threat to a few sites. Changes to bog hydrology, through impoundment or draining, lead to vegetation changes. Slow vegetation growth rates, due to the nutrient poor environment, result in slow recovery from physical disturbances, such as recreational trail use. If disturbance, such as foot traffic, is a necessity, traversing during frozen conditions or using boardwalks can minimize impacts. (Gawler and Cutko, 2010)
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia), shrub
-
rhodora (Rhododendron canadense), shrub
-
bog Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), shrub
-
black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata), shrub
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), shrub
-
small cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos), shrub
-
bog laurel (Kalmia polifolia), shrub
-
tall cottongrass (Eriophorum angustifolium), grass
-
purple pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), other herbaceous
Dominant resource concerns
-
Organic matter depletion
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Pesticides transported to surface water
-
Pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids, or compost applications transported to surface water
-
Petroleum, heavy metals, and other pollutants transported to surface water
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Reduction (significant) in canopy cover
Conservation practices
Forest Stand Improvement | |
---|---|
Forest Land Management | |
Multi-story cropping, sustainable management of nontimber forest plants | |
Monitoring and Evaluation |
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Seeding, planting, seed dispersal
State 2
Semi-natural State
Shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics driven by natural disturbances, processes, and pressures (may have some anthropogenic influences). More research is needed to determine the extent of the Semi-natural state associated with this ecological site.
Community 2.1
Invasiveness and Biological Introductions
Introduction of invasive species, pathogens, and/or pests resulting in shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics. More research is needed to determine the extent of these effects on the semi-natural state associated with this ecological site.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
State 3
Cultural State
Shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics that are primary driven by anthropogenic disturbances and pressures (may have some associated natural influences). More research is needed to determine the extent of the cultural state associated with this ecological site.
Community 3.1
Drained Forest
Hydrologically altered wetland resulting in a drained forest for timber management and products
Community 3.2
Pasture or Hayland
Site used for grazing pasture or hay cultivation
Community 3.3
Drained Cropland
Hydrological alteration and mechanical landscape alteration for crop production
Pathway 3.1a
Community 3.1 to 3.2
Hydrological alteration
Pathway 3.2a
Community 3.2 to 3.1
Hydrological alteration
Pathway 3.2b
Community 3.2 to 3.3
Mechanical soil disturbance, clearing, landscape alteration, seeding or planting
Pathway 3.3a
Community 3.3 to 3.2
Cultivated cropland through mechanical landscape alteration and soil disturbance
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
Shifts in community composition and ecological dynamics in response to climate change and associated disturbances. Introduction of invasive species, pests, and/or pathogens
Conservation practices
Monitoring and Evaluation |
---|
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3
Hydrological alteration, mechanical landscape alteration and soil disturbance
Conservation practices
Deep Tillage | |
---|---|
Clearing and Snagging | |
Dam, Diversion | |
Diversion | |
Land Clearing | |
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation |
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1
Removal, remediation, or control of invasive species, pests, and/or pathogens
Conservation practices
Wetland Restoration | |
---|---|
Wetland Enhancement | |
Restoration and Management of Natural Ecosystems | |
Native Plant Community Restoration and Management | |
Pathogen Management | |
Forest Land Management | |
Invasive Plant Species Control | |
Invasive Species Pest Management | |
Monitoring and Evaluation |
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
Hydrological alteration, mechanical landscape alteration and soil disturbance.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1
Remediation of hydrological alteration, actively managed restoration, seeding/planting
Restoration pathway R3B
State 3 to 2
Remediation of hydrological alteration, actively managed restoration, seeding/planting
Additional community tables
Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Future work is needed, as described in a future project plan, to validate the information presented in this provisional ecological site description. Future work includes field sampling, data collection and analysis by qualified vegetation ecologists and soil scientists. As warranted, annual reviews of the project plan can be conducted by the Ecological Site Technical Team. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD are necessary to approve a final document.
Other references
Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Grawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schultz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia
Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine.
NatureServe. 2018. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. NatureServe Explorer (accessed 10 July. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 296
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. (accessed 11 Aug. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Climate Research Station Data. Available online. (accessed 23 June. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for [MLRA 146, Maine]. Available online. (accessed 14 Oct. 2021).
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2017. United States National Vegetation Classification Database V2.01. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. Available The U.S. National Vegetation Classification (usnvc.org) (accessed 2 July. 2021).
Contributors
Christopher Mann
Jamin Johanson
Approval
Nels Barrett, 9/27/2024
Acknowledgments
Nels Barrett, Nick Butler, and Carl Bickford provided considerable review of this ecological site concept.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 09/28/2024 |
Approved by | Nels Barrett |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.