Very Shallow
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1 More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
State 1 Narrative:
The Reference State represents non-invaded communities composed of native species. Invasive annual grasses are not present. Very Shallow sites rarely burn, and in most cases, receives minimal grazing. This ecological site is the most stable ecological site on the landscape.
Reference Community 1.1 is the classic Very Shallow, dominated by Sandberg bluegrass with one or more low shrub species. The low shrub component may be stiff sage, low sage &/or one or more buckwheat low shrub species. So, Community 1.1 is mostly very stable. remaining in State 1 regardless of climate or management. Similarity Index scores are typically higher on Very Shallow than other ecological sites on the landscape.
Community 1.2 represents a community phase which is quite rare in MLRA 6. The species are native, but Sandberg bluegrass has a diminished presence and forbs are more prominent. Community 1.2 still has enough Sandberg bluegrass present, to shift back to reference community 1.1, given and improvement in grazing use by wildlife, feral horses and livestock.
Reference State Community Phases:
1.1 Reference Sandberg bluegrass – low shrub
1.2 Native forb – low shrub
Dominant Reference State Species:
Sandberg bluegrass and stiff sage, low sage &/or low shrub buckwheat species
At-risk Communities:
• All communities in the reference state are at risk of moving to State 2. The seed source of cheatgrass is nearby and blowing onto most sites annually
• Community 1.1 has a high Sandberg bluegrass cover and is thus, at low risk of moving to State 2, Forb-Annual Grass
• Community 1.2, the degraded native community, has low amount of Sandberg bluegrass cover and a high amount of forb cover, and is at considerable risk of moving to State 2
Submodel
Description
State 2 Narrative:
This state represents a shift from native grasses to a forb-annual grass dominated situation. The low shrubs usually remain. Most Very Shallow sites never cross the threshold into State 2. They stay at climax or near climax condition, as these sites generally receive limited grazing pressure and rarely burn.
State 2 is rare. The situation below has been witnessed on a couple of ridgetops west of Yakima on MLRA 6 sites. Chronic heavy grazing in the spring from migrating elk, feral horses or livestock caused the following:
• Near elimination of Sandberg bluegrass, resulting in
• A plant community dominated almost exclusively by annual forbs &/or annual grasses.
• Annual grasses were rare in the situations witnessed west of Yakima
Invasive annual grasses, which are common & frequently dominant on Loamy ecological sites, do not compete as well on Very Shallow sites. But a micro-burst of cheatgrass can occur. Cheatgrass seed blows onto Very Shallow sites annually. In a year with heavy snowfall and early spring rain, such as 2017, the site had far more moisture than the plant community can utilize. This is the opportunity for cheatgrass seed to germinate and produce a huge flush of cheatgrass plants. In following years when moisture is normal or below normal, cheatgrass seed will not germinate or make viable plants. So, these micro-bursts of cheatgrass tend to be episodic and mostly a temporary condition on Very Shallow sites.
However, the description above may not apply to Very Shallow sites on the High Prairie in Klickitat county or on the Swauk Prairie in Kittitas County. These prairie sites have been altered by heavy grazing pressure and may be dominated by cheatgrass, medusahead, ventenata or bulbous bluegrass. Lomatium or another native forb are prominent as well.
A reduction to Sandberg bluegrass cover allows annual grasses the opportunity to colonize and invade on a more permanent basis. Occasionally one will find minor amounts of scattered annual grasses on Very Shallow sites.
Heavy grazing use disrupts the soil surface and the moss-lichen layer via animal hooves, which in turn, causes loss of both soil structure and biological crust. When this happens site resistance to erosional forces are greatly diminished.
State 2 will likely have much less or much more pedestaling than the reference condition. Trampling by livestock or game animals can obliterate pedestals and terracettes. Or, erosion in water flow patterns can cause much more pedestaling than reference condition.
Submodel
Mechanism
T1 Note: this transition is quite rare. This has been witnessed only a couple of times.
Result: Shift from Reference State Community 1.2 to State 2 Community 2.1 which is dominated by forbs and/or annual grasses. Most or all Sandberg bluegrass plants are lost from the community.
Primary Trigger: extensive spring grazing with heavy to severe use of Sandberg bluegrass. The grazing pressure can come from elk, cattle or horses.
Secondary triggers: a micro-burst of annual grasses could put Community 1.2 at risk. The trampling of Very Shallow soils by grazing animals could also trigger transition to State 2.
Ecological process: consistent defoliation pressure to Sandberg bluegrass results in poor vigor, shrinking crowns, and plant mortality. Unpalatable native forbs increase to take advantage in the release of resources and niche space. The soil is more open to evaporation, to wind and water erosion, and facilitates plant community changes from Community 1.2 to Community 2.1. If the pressure continues a few invasive forbs colonize the site.
Indicators: Declining vigor and cover of Sandberg bluegrass, declining soil biotic crust and, increasing gaps between perennial species.
Recovery
State 2 is considered non-reversible. Restoration of Sandberg bluegrass, the low shrub component, native forbs and the soil biotic crust would be very problematic at best on Very Shallow. Seeds must germinate. Seedlings and plugged plants need soil moisture and time to become established. In most years, seeds and plugs may not have a chance as site conditions on Very Shallow can change quickly. Drying winds and bright sun can turn a snowy or muddy site into a hard crust before plants are established. So, the timing of all recovery efforts would have an extremely narrow window of opportunity on Very Shallow.
References:
Boling M., Frazier B., Busacca, A., General Soil Map of Washington, Washington State University, 1998
Daubenmire, R., Steppe Vegetation of Washington, EB1446, March 1968
Davies, Kirk, Medusahead Dispersal and Establishment in Sagebrush Steppe Plant Communities, Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2008
Environmental Protection Agency, map of Level III and IV Ecoregions of Washington, June 2010
Miller, Baisan, Rose and Pacioretty, “Pre and Post Settlement Fire regimes in mountain Sagebrush communities: The Northern Intermountain Region
Natural Resources Conservation Service, map of Common Resource Areas of Washington, 2003
Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model for Wyoming sagebrush, LANDFIRE project, 2008
Rocchio, Joseph & Crawford, Rex C., Ecological Systems of Washington State. A Guide to Identification. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, October 2015. Pages 156-161 Inter-Mountain Basin Big Sagebrush.
Rouse, Gerald, MLRA 8 Ecological Sites as referenced from Natural Resources Conservation Service-Washington FOTG, 2004
Soil Conservation Service, Range Sites for MLRA 8 from 1980s and 1990s
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological site groups and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological site groups
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.