
Stony Overflow - High Central
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Restoration pathway T3A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The Reference State represents what is believed to show the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of the Stony Overflow ecological site prior to European settlement. This site in the Reference State (1.0) is dominated by cool-season bunchgrasses, sedges, and a very diverse forb component. Shrubby cinquefoil and snowberry are the dominant shrubs. Trees include quaking aspen, scattered ponderosa pine, and white spruce. Aspen will primary occur along the margin of the Stony Overflow site adjacent to forested slopes. In pre-European times, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included grazing and browsing by large ungulates, periods of below and above average precipitation, and periodic fire. Timing of fires and herbivory coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Today the primary disturbance is from the lack of fire, concentrated livestock grazing, and wildlife browse. Grasses that are desirable for livestock and wildlife can decline and a corresponding increase in less desirable or more grazing-resistant grasses will occur. Favorable growing conditions occurred during the spring and the warm months of June through August. Today a similar state will be difficult to find due to the predominance and invasiveness of non-native cool-season perennial gasses.
Submodel
State 2
Native/Invaded State



Description
The Native/Invaded State represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire due to fire suppression. This state is dominated by cool-season bunchgrasses, sedges, and shrubby cinquefoil. It can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and on some areas receiving periodic rest. Native cool-season grasses and sedges will decline as non-native cool-season grasses increase. Non-Native cool-season grasses will make up less than 15 percent of total annual production in this state. Preliminary studies indicate that when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition, a threshold has been crossed to an Invaded State (3.0). These invaded plant communities that are dominated by Kentucky bluegrass will have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Submodel
Description
The Invaded State is the result of invasion and dominance of non-native cool-season grass species on the site. Dominate grasses include Kentucky bluegrass, timothy, and redtop. Continuous season-long grazing or heavy continuous grazing will result in an increase of non-native grasses and forbs. Non-use and no fire will result in an increasing thatch layer that tends to favor the more shade tolerant non-native grass species. The nutrient cycle is impaired, resulting in a higher level of nitrogen which also favors non-native species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the non-native grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition. Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Submodel
Mechanism
Continuous season-long grazing; the invasion of non-native cool-season grasses; and extended periods of non-use and no fire will transition the Reference State (1.0) to the Native/Invaded State (2.0).
Mechanism
Continuous season-long grazing; or heavy continuous grazing; and the expansion of conifers will transition the Native/Invaded State (2.0) to the Invaded State (3.0). Long-term non-use and no fire and the expansion of conifers will also cause the Native/Invaded State (2.0) to transition to the Invaded State (3.0). This transition is most likely to originate from plant community 2.2.
Mechanism
This transition will require fire or timber harvest to remove conifer encroachment and fire or prescribed burning to suppress the non-native cool-season grass, and herbaceous weed control to treat invasive forbs. These practices need to be followed with long-term prescribed grazing including proper stocking rates, change in season of use, and deferment that provides adequate time for plant recovery. This may facilitate a transition from the Invaded State (4.0) to the Native/Invaded State (2.0). This will take a long period of time and recovery may not meet management objectives. Success will largely depend on whether native reproductive propagules remain intact on the site.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Brush Management |
|
Prescribed Burning |
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.