Loess Upland Flatwoods
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Cultural treatments are implemented to increase forage quality and yield.
More details -
Transition T1B
Ag conversion via tillage, seeding and non-selective herbicide.
More details -
Transition T2A
Ag conversion via tillage, seeding and non-selective herbicide.
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Site preparation; tree planting; non-native species control; native seeding.
More details -
Transition T3A
Cultural treatments are implemented to increase forage quality and yield.
More details -
Restoration pathway R3A
Site preparation; tree planting; non-native species control; native seeding.
More details -
Transition T4A
Cultural treatments are implemented to increase forage quality and yield.
More details -
Transition T4B
Ag conversion via tillage, seeding and non-selective herbicide.
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The reference plant community is categorized as an open oak woodland community. The two community phases within the reference state are dependent on seasonal high-water tables, fire, or storm damage. These disturbances alter species composition, cover, and extent. Drought has more localized impacts in the reference phases, but does contribute to overall species composition, diversity, and productivity.
Submodel
Description
The pasture state occurs when the site is converted to a farming system that emphasizes domestic livestock production known as grassland agriculture. Fire suppression, periodic cultural treatments (e.g., clipping, drainage, soil amendment applications, planting new species and/or cultivars, mechanical harvesting) and grazing by domesticated livestock transition and maintain this state (USDA-NRCS 2003). Early settlers seeded non-native species, such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), to help extend the grazing season (Smith 1998). Over time, as lands were continuously harvested or grazed by herds of cattle, the non-native species were able to spread and expand across the landscape, reducing the native species diversity and ecological function.
Submodel
Description
The low topographic relief across the MLRA has resulted in nearly the entire area being converted to agriculture (Eilers and Roosa 1994). Subsurface drainage and the continuous use of tillage, row-crop planting, and chemicals (i.e., herbicides, fertilizers, etc.) have effectively eliminated the reference community and many of its natural ecological functions in favor of crop production. Corn and soybeans are the dominant crops for the site, and oats (Avena L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) may be rotated periodically. These areas are likely to remain in crop production for the foreseeable future.
Submodel
Description
The combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbances occurring today has resulted in numerous forest health issues, and restoration back to the historic reference condition may not be possible. Woodlands are being stressed by non-native diseases and pests, habitat fragmentation, permanent changes in soil hydrology, and overabundant deer populations on top of naturally-occurring disturbances (severe weather and native pests) (Flickinger 2010). However, these habitats provide multiple ecosystem services including carbon sequestration; clean air and water; soil conservation; biodiversity support; wildlife habitat; timber, fiber, and fuel products; as well as a variety of cultural activities (e.g., hiking, camping, hunting) (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005; Flickinger 2010). Therefore, conservation of forests and woodlands should still be pursued. Woodland reconstructions are an important tool for repairing natural ecological functioning and providing habitat protection for numerous species associated with these sites. Therefore, ecological restoration should aim to aid the recovery of degraded, damaged, or destroyed ecosystems. A successful restoration will have the ability to structurally and functionally sustain itself, demonstrate resilience to the ranges of stress and disturbance, and create and maintain positive biotic and abiotic interactions (SER 2002). The reconstructed state is the result of a long-term commitment involving a multi-step, adaptive management process.
Submodel
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transitions the site to the pasture state (2).
Mechanism
Tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (3).
Mechanism
Tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (3).
Mechanism
Site preparation, tree planting, invasive species control, and seeding native species transition this site to the reconstructed flatwoods state (4).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transitions the site to the pasture state (2).
Mechanism
Site preparation, tree planting, invasive species control, and seeding native species transition this site to the reconstructed flatwoods state (4).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transition the site to the pasture state (2).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.