Low-Base Chert Protected Backslope Woodland
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T1C More details
- Transition T1D More details
- Transition T1E More details
- Restoration pathway R1C More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T2B More details
- Restoration pathway R1B More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Transition T3B More details
- Restoration pathway R1A More details
- Transition T4A More details
- Transition T4B More details
- Transition T5A More details
- Transition T6B More details
- Transition T6A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The historical reference state for this ecological site was likely dominated by white oak, black oak and post oak. Scattered shortleaf pine may also have been present in the canopy. Periodic disturbances from fire, wind or ice maintained the woodland structure and diverse ground flora species. Long disturbance-free periods allowed an increase in both the density of trees and the abundance of shade tolerant species. Two community phases are recognized in the reference state, with shifts between phases based on disturbance frequency. Many sites have been converted to grassland (State 5). Others have been subject to repeated, high-graded timber harvest coupled with domestic livestock grazing (State 6). Fire suppression has resulted in increased canopy density, which has affected the abundance and diversity of ground flora. Many reference sites have been managed for timber harvest, resulting in either even-age (State 2) or uneven-age (State 3) woodlands.
Submodel
Description
These woodlands tend to be rather dense, with a sparse understory and ground flora. Thinning can increase overall tree vigor and improve understory diversity. However, in the absence of fire, the diversity and cover of the ground flora is still diminished. Continual timber management, depending on the practices used, will either maintain this state, or convert the site to uneven-age (State 3) woodlands. Prescribed fire without extensive timber harvest will, over time, cause a transition to Managed Oak Woodlands (State 4).
Submodel
Description
Composition is altered from the reference state depending on tree selection during harvest. In addition, without a regular 15 to 20 year harvest re-entry into these stands, they will slowly increase in more shade tolerant species and white oak will become less dominant.. Without periodic disturbance, stem density and fire intolerant species, like hickory, increase in abundance.
Submodel
Description
The Fire Managed Oak Woodland state results from managing woodland communities on exposed aspects in States 2 or 3 with prescribed fire, over time. This state resembles the reference state, with younger maximum tree ages and lower ground flora diversity.
Submodel
Description
Conversion of woodlands to non-native cool season grassland species such as tall fescue has been common. Low available water, abundant surface fragments, low organic matter contents and soil acidity make non-native grasslands difficult to maintain in a healthy, productive state on this ecological site. Occasionally, these pastures will have scattered patches of tall, mature pine. If grazing and pasture management is discontinued, oak sprouts will occur and the site will eventually transition to State 2. Forest stand improvement and tree planting practices can hasten this process.
Submodel
Description
Timbered sites subjected to repeated, high-graded timber harvests and domestic grazing transition to this State. This state exhibits an over-abundance of hickory and other less desirable tree species, and weedy understory species such as buckbrush, gooseberry, poison ivy and Virginia creeper. The vegetation offers little nutritional value for cattle, and excessive stocking damages tree boles, degrades understory species composition and results in soil compaction and accelerated erosion and runoff. Exclusion of cattle from sites in this state coupled with uneven-age management techniques will cause a transition to State 3 (Uneven-Age).
Submodel
Mechanism
This transition typically results from even-age forest management practices, such as clear-cut, seed tree or shelterwood harvest and fire suppression.
Mechanism
This transition pathway generally requires forest management practices. Prescribed fire is is maintained. Mechanical thinning may be necessary in dense woodlands. Periodic timber harvests occur.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of the systematic application of prescribed fire; forest stand improvement; harvesting.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of clearing the woodland community and planting pasture species. Soil erosion can be extensive in this process, along with loss of organic matter. Liming and fertilizing associated with pasture management typically raises the soil pH and increases the cation concentration (such as calcium and magnesium) of the upper soil horizons.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of poorly planned timber harvest techniques such as high-grading, accompanied by unmanaged livestock grazing. Soil erosion and compaction often result from grazing after the understory has been damaged.
Mechanism
This restoration pathway generally requires forest management practices with extended rotations that allow mature trees to exceed ages of about 100 years. Prescribed fire is part of the restoration process. Mechanical thinning may be necessary in dense woodlands.
Mechanism
This transition typically results from uneven-age timber management practices, such as single tree or group selection harvest.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of the systematic application of prescribed fire; forest stand improvement; harvesting.
Mechanism
This restoration pathway generally requires forest management practices with extended rotations that allow mature trees to exceed ages of about 100 years. Prescribed fire is part of the restoration process. Mechanical thinning may be necessary in dense woodlands.
Mechanism
This transition typically results from even-age forest management practices, such as clear-cut, seed tree or shelterwood harvest.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of the systematic application of prescribed fire. Mechanical thinning may also be used; forest stand improvement; harvesting
Mechanism
This restoration pathway generally requires forest management practices with extended rotations that allow mature trees to exceed ages of about 100 years. Prescribed fire is part of the restoration process. Mechanical thinning may be necessary in dense woodlands.
Mechanism
This transition typically results from even-age forest management practices, such as clear-cut, seed tree or shelterwood harvest and fire suppression.
Mechanism
This transition typically results from uneven-age timber management practices, such as single tree or group selection harvest; fire suppression; harvesting
Mechanism
This transition results from the cessation of grazing and associated pasture management such as mowing and brush-hogging. Herbicide application, tree planting and forest stand improvement techniques can speed up this otherwise very lengthy transition.
Mechanism
This transition results from the cessation of grazing and associated pasture management such as mowing and brush-hogging. Herbicide application, tree planting and forest stand improvement techniques can speed up this otherwise very lengthy transition.
Mechanism
This transition is the result of clearing the woodland communities and planting grassland species. Soil erosion can be extensive in this process, along with loss of organic matter. Liming and fertilizing associated with pasture management typically raises the soil pH and increases the cation concentration (such as calcium and magnesium) of the upper soil horizons.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.