

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R054XY030ND
Shallow Loamy
Last updated: 3/31/2025
Accessed: 04/04/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 054X–Rolling Soft Shale Plain
MLRA 54 covers 29,280 square miles and encompasses approximately 18.7 million acres. MLRA 54 spans three states with 64 percent of it in North Dakota, 33 percent in South Dakota, and 3 percent in Montana. Most of MLRA 54 is underlain by soft, calcareous shale, siltstone, and sandstone of the Tertiary Fort Union Group and the Cretaceous Fox Hills and Hell Creek Formations. Most of the soils in MLRA 54 developed from residuum weathered in place including colluvial and alluvial deposits from residuum. Along the eastern and northern edges of the MLRA where MLRA 54 transitions into the glaciated Missouri plateau, remnants of glacial till parent materials remain on the high areas of the landscape. The MLRA 54 landscape is characterized by moderately dissected rolling plains with areas of local badlands, hills, and isolated buttes. Elevation is 1,650 feet (505 meters) on the eastern side of the MLRA with a gradual rise to 3,600 feet (1,100 meters) on the western side. The Missouri River runs along the north and east side of MLRA 54. Most of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, the northwest third of the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation, and the Grand River National Grasslands are in the southern part of the MLRA.
Classification relationships
Level IV Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: 43a – Missouri Plateau; 43c – River Breaks; 43j – Moreau Prairie.
Ecological site concept
The Shallow Loamy ecological site is generally located on convex shoulder slopes of rises, knolls and ridges on sedimentary plains; in some areas, the sedimentary plains are thinly capped with remnant glacial till. Included in this site are soils with shallow duripan layers; these soils occur on upland divides. The soils are shallow (10 to 20 inches) to soft sedimentary bedrock (Cr horizon) affecting root growth or duripan (silicrete) restricting root growth. Typically, the texture above the soft bedrock is loam, but silt loam, clay loam, and silty clay loam may also occur. The soil forms a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long. Soil on this site is well drained. On the landscape, this site is above the Clayey, Limy Residual, Loamy, Loamy Overflow, Claypan and Thin Claypan ecological sites. In some steep and very steep areas, the Very Shallow site is on similar or slightly higher landscape positions; it is less than 10 inches to sedimentary bedrock or less than 20 inches to porcelanite (scoria). A few areas of Badland or Steep-Sided Wooded Draw ecological sites may also occur in association with this site. Also, in the Killdeer Mountains, the Upland Hardwood Forest ecological site is associated with the Shallow Loamy site.
To see a full copy of the ecological site description with all tables and the full version 5 rangeland health worksheet. Please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/54_Shallow_Loamy_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf
Associated sites
R054XY023ND |
Loamy Overflow This site occurs on base slopes with less than 6 percent slope - a run-on position. The soil is >40 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock. The surface and subsoil layers form a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long. |
---|---|
R054XY031ND |
Loamy This site is lower on the landscape on linear slopes with slopes >6%. The soil is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock or duripan. The surface and subsoil layers form a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long; it is non-calcareous to a depth of >8 inches. |
R054XY033ND |
Thin Claypan This site is lower on the landscape. The soil is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock or duripan. It has a root-restrictive claypan layer within a depth of 6 inches and accumulated salts within 16 inches. |
R054XY035ND |
Very Shallow This site is on somewhat higher landscape positions than the Shallow Loamy ecological site. The soil is <10 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock (affects root growth) or <20 inches to root- restrictive porcelanite (scoria). The soils are excessively drained. |
F054XY046ND |
Upland Hardwood Forest This site is lower on the landscape than the Shallow Loamy ecological site on limestone capped buttes (Killdeer Mountains). The soil is >20 inches to a restrictive layer and has forest vegetation. |
R054XY046ND |
Limy Residual This site is on somewhat higher landscape positions than the Shallow Loamy ecological site. The soil is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock or duripan. The surface and subsoil layers form a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long; it is calcareous within a depth of 8 inches. |
R054XY020ND |
Clayey This site is lower on the landscape than the Shallow Loamy ecological site. The soil is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock, duripan, or other root-restrictive layer. The soil forms a ribbon >2 inches long. |
R054XY021ND |
Claypan This site is lower on the landscape than the Shallow Loamy ecological site. The soil is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock or duripan. It has a sodic, root-restrictive claypan layer starting at a depth between 6 and 20 inches; where present, accumulated salts are deeper than 16 inches. |
Similar sites
R054XY035ND |
Very Shallow This site is on somewhat higher landscape positions than the Shallow Loamy ecological site. The soil is <10 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock (affects root growth) or <20 inches to root- restrictive porcelanite (scoria). The soils are excessively drained. |
---|---|
R054XY043ND |
Shallow Sandy This site occurs on similar landscape positions as Shallow Loamy ecological sites. If the soil forms a ribbon, it is less than 1 inch long and the soil is 10 to 20 inches to soft sandstone bedrock. |
R053BY015ND |
Thin Loamy This site occurs on similar or higher landscape positions on till- capped sedimentary plains. It is >20 inches to soft sedimentary bedrock and is highly calcareous (strong or violent effervescence) within a depth of 8 inches. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
(1) Schizachyrium scoparium |
Physiographic features
This site primarily occurs on rises, knolls and ridges on sedimentary plains; it also occurs on upland divides. Generally, the parent material is soft, weathered residuum (typically siltstone or mudstone); however, a thin cap of remnant glacial till over weathered residuum may occur. On upland divides, the soils formed in loamy alluvium over a duripan. Slopes range from 0 to 70 percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Rise
(2) Ridge (3) Knoll (4) Divide |
---|---|
Runoff class | Low to very high |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 1,650 – 3,600 ft |
Slope | 70% |
Water table depth | 80 in |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
MLRA 54 is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of MLRA 54. The continental climate is the result of this MLRA’s location in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains, so air masses move unobstructed across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature.
Annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 18 inches per year. The normal average annual temperature is about 42° F. January is the coldest month with average temperatures ranging from about 13° F (Beach, ND) to about 16° F (Bison, SD). July is the warmest month with temperatures averaging from about 69° F (Beach, ND) to about 72° F (Timber Lake, SD). The range of normal average monthly temperatures between the coldest and warmest months is about 57° F. This large temperature range attests to the continental nature of MLRA 54’s climate. Wind speeds average about 11 miles per hour, ranging from about 13 miles per hour during the spring to about 10 miles per hour during the summer. Daytime wind speeds are generally stronger than nighttime wind speeds, and occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts to more than 50 miles per hour.
Growth of native cool-season plants begins in late March and continues through early to mid-July. Native warm-season plants begin growth in mid-May and continue to the end of August. Greening-up of cool-season plants can occur again in September and October when adequate soil moisture is present.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 95-111 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 118-127 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 15-18 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 91-114 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 116-129 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 15-18 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 101 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 123 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 16 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) HETTINGER [USC00324178], Hettinger, ND
-
(2) FT YATES 4 SW [USC00323207], Fort Yates, ND
-
(3) DUPREE [USC00392429], Dupree, SD
-
(4) WATFORD CITY [USC00329233], Watford City, ND
-
(5) MANDAN EXP STN [USC00325479], Mandan, ND
-
(6) LUDLOW 3 SSE [USC00395048], Ludlow, SD
-
(7) HEBRON [USC00324102], Hebron, ND
Influencing water features
This site does not receive additional water as runoff from adjacent slopes; it is on a run-off landscape position. Neither does it receive significant additional water from a seasonal high-water table. Depth to the water table typically exceeds 6 feet throughout the growing season. Surface infiltration and permeability above the weathered bedrock or the duripan are moderately slow to moderate. Water loss is through evapotranspiration and percolation below the root zone.
Soil features
Soils associated with Shallow Loamy ES are in the Mollisol and Entisol orders. The Mollisols are classified further as Entic Haplustolls, Entic Durustolls, and Lithic Argiustolls. The Entisols are classified further as Typic Ustorthents. These soils primarily formed in weathered residuum; but soils with a thin cap of remnant till or over residuum are included in the site. A few formed in loamy alluvium over a duripan. They are well drained. The common features of soils in this site are a medium or moderately fine texture (forms a ribbon 1 to 2 inches long) and a shallow depth (10 to 20 inches) to soft sedimentary bedrock or duripan. Root growth is affected by soft bedrock or restricted by a duripan. The texture above the soft bedrock is loam, silt loam, clay loam, or silty clay loam.
Above the soft bedrock or duripan, soil salinity is none or very slight (E.C. <2 dS/m); sodicity is typically none. Soil reaction is slightly acid to moderately alkaline (pH 6.1 to 8.4) and calcium carbonate content is none to high (0-35%).
There is a risk of rills and eventually gullies if vegetative cover is not adequate. The bedrock or duripan affects water movement and root penetration. These soils are mainly susceptible to water erosion and, to a lesser degree, wind erosion. The hazard of water erosion increases where slope is >15 percent and adequate vegetative cover is lacking. Low available water capacity, commonly coupled with high accumulations of lime, strongly influences the soil-water-plant relationship. Loss of the soil surface layer can result in a shift in species composition and/or production.
Major soil series correlated to the Shallow Loamy site are Cabba and Werner. Included soil series with a duripan are Farfeld and Sinnigam.
Access Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) for specific local soils information.
Parent Material Kind: residuum, till-capped residuum, alluvium over duripan
Parent Material Origin: siltstone, mudstone
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Residuum
(2) Alluvium (3) Siltstone (4) Mudstone |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Loam (2) Silt loam (3) Silty clay loam (4) Clay loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderate |
Soil depth | 10 – 20 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 15% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 3% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
1.5 – 4 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-20in) |
35% |
Electrical conductivity (0-20in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-20in) |
2 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
6.1 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
45% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
42% |
Ecological dynamics
This ecological site description is based on nonequilibrium ecology and resilience theory and utilizes a State-and-Transition Model (STM) diagram to organize and communicate information about ecosystem change as a basis for management. The ecological dynamics characterized by the STM diagram reflect how changes in ecological drivers, feedback mechanisms, and controlling variables can maintain or induce changes in plant community composition (phases and/or states). The application of various management actions, combined with weather variables, impact the ecological processes which influence the competitive interactions, thereby maintaining or altering plant community structure.
Prior to European influence, the historical disturbance regime for MLRA 54 included frequent fires, both anthropogenic and natural in origin. Most fires, however, were anthropogenic fires set by Native Americans. Native Americans set fires in all months except perhaps January. These fires occurred in two peak periods, one from March-May with the peak in April and another from July-November with the peak occurring in October. Most of these fires were scattered and of small extent and duration. The grazing history would have involved grazing and browsing by large herbivores (such as American bison, elk, and whitetail deer). Herbivory by small mammals, insects, nematodes, and other invertebrates are also important factors influencing the production and composition of the communities. Grazing and fire interaction, particularly when coupled with drought events, influenced the dynamics discussed and displayed in the following state and transition diagram and descriptions.
Following European influence, this ecological site generally has had a history of grazing by domestic livestock, particularly cattle, which along with other related activities (e.g., fencing, water development, fire suppression) has changed the disturbance regime of the site. Changes will occur in the plant communities due to these and other factors.
Weather fluctuations, coupled with managerial factors, may lead to changes in the plant communities and may, under adverse impacts, result in a slow decline in vegetative vigor and composition. However, under favorable conditions the botanical composition may resemble that prior to European influence.
Four vegetative states have been identified for the site (Reference, Native/Invaded, Invaded, and Go- Back). Within each state, one or more community phases have been identified. These community phases are named based on the more dominant and visually conspicuous species; they have been determined by study of historical documents, relict areas, scientific studies, and ecological aspects of plant species and plant communities. Transitional pathways and thresholds have been determined through similar methods.
State 1: Reference State represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site prior to European influence. Dynamics of the state were largely determined by variations in climate and weather (e.g., drought), as well as that of fire (e.g., timing, frequency) and grazing by native herbivores (e.g., frequency, intensity, selectivity). Due to those variations, the Reference State is thought to have shifted temporally and spatially between four plant community phases.
Currently the primary disturbances include widespread introduction of exotic species, concentrated livestock grazing, lack of fire, and perhaps long-term non-use and no fire. Because of these changes (particularly the widespread occurrence of exotic species), as well as other environmental changes, the Reference State is considered to no longer exist. Thus, the presence of exotic species on the site precludes it from being placed in the Reference State. It must then be placed in one of the other states, commonly State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A).
State 2: Native/Invaded State. Colonization of the site by exotic species results in a transition from State 1: Reference State to State 2: Native/Invaded State (T1A). This transition was probably inevitable; it often resulted from colonization by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) which have been particularly and consistently invasive under extended periods of no use and no fire. Other exotics plants (e.g., Canada thistle, leafy spurge) are also known to invade the site.
Four community phases have been identified for this state; they are similar to the community phases in the Reference State but have now been invaded by exotic cool-season grasses. These exotic cool- season grasses can be expected to increase. As that increase occurs, plants more desirable to wildlife and livestock may decline. A decline in forb diversity can also be expected. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch increases and may become a physical barrier to plant growth. This also changes the micro-climate near the soil surface and may alter infiltration, nutrient cycling, and biological activity near the soil surface. As a result, these factors coupled with shading cause desirable native plants to have increasing difficulty remaining viable and recruitment declines. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses or other exotic plants, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitoring, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these exotic plants, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected (T2A).
State 3: Invaded State. The threshold for this state is reached when both the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass) exceed 30% of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40% of the community. One community phase has been identified for this state.
The exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive and often form monotypic stands. As they increase, both forage quantity and quality of the annual production becomes increasingly restricted to late spring and early summer, even though annual production may increase. Forb diversity often declines. Under non-use or minimal use management, mulch can increase and becomes a physical barrier to plant growth which alters nutrient cycling, infiltration, and soil biological activity. As such, desirable native plants become increasingly displaced.
Once the state is well established, prescribed burning and prescribed grazing techniques have been largely ineffective in suppressing or eliminating the exotic cool-season grasses, even though some short-term reductions may appear successful. However, assuming there is an adequate component of native grasses to respond to treatments, a restoration pathway to State 2: Native/Invaded State may be accomplished with the implementation of long-term prescribed grazing in conjunction with prescribed burning (R3A). If an adequate component of native grasses is not present, a subsequent range planting may be necessary to complete the restoration.
State 4: Go-Back State. This state often results following cropland abandonment and consists of only one plant community phase. This weedy assemblage may include noxious weeds that need control. Over time, the exotic cool-season grasses (Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass) will likely predominate.
Initially, due to extensive bare ground and a preponderance of shallow rooted annual plants, the potential for soil erosion is high. Plant species richness may be high, but overall diversity (i.e., equitability) is typically low, with the site dominated by a relatively small assemblage of species. Due to the lack of native perennials and other factors, restoring the site with the associated ecological processes is difficult. However, a successful range planting may result in something approaching State 2: Native/Invaded State (R4A). Following planting, long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning, haying, and the use of herbicides will generally be necessary to achieve the desired result and control weeds, some of which may be noxious weeds. A failed range planting and/or secondary succession will lead to State 4: Invaded State (R4B).
Juniper Invasion - Juniper species may have been present as scattered trees or shrubs prior to European influence. Since that time, decreased fire frequency, increased fire suppression, and dispersal from shelterbelts have been particularly important in enabling junipers to increase and potentially dominate a wide range of rangeland and forest land ecological sites in MLRA 54. Extended periods of non-use or very light grazing may also be factors.
Where a conifer seed source is available, woody encroachment begins to expand, exploit, and eventually dominate the sites, threatening the ecological integrity of the sites. Without managerial intervention, these sites may transition to a Conifer Invaded State. As depicted in the following diagram, confer seeds disperse into an intact grassland beginning the process of woody encroachment.
The following state and transition model diagram illustrates the common states, community phases, community pathways, and transition and restoration pathways that can occur on the site. These are the most common plant community phases and states based on current knowledge and experience; changes may be made as more data are collected. Pathway narratives describing the site’s ecological dynamics reference various management practices (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed fire, brush management, herbaceous weed treatment) which, if properly designed and implemented, will positively influence plant community competitive interactions. The design of these management practices will be site specific and should be developed by knowledgeable individuals; based upon management goals and a resource inventory; and supported by an ongoing monitoring protocol.
When the management goal is to maintain an existing plant community phase or restore to another phase within the same state, modification of existing management to ensure native species have the competitive advantage may be required. To restore a previous state, the application of two or more management practices in an ongoing manner will be required. Whether using prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, or a combination of both with or without additional practices (e.g., brush management), the timing and method of application needs to favor the native species over the exotic species. Adjustments to account for variations in annual growing conditions and implementing an ongoing monitoring protocol to track changes and adjust management inputs to ensure desired outcome will be necessary.
The plant community phase composition table(s) has been developed from the best available knowledge including research, historical records, clipping studies, and inventory records. As more data are collected, plant community species composition and production information may be revised.
State and transition model

Figure 8. Stages of Woody Encroachment - Adapted from: Reducing Woody Encroachment in Grasslands – A Guide for Understanding Risk and Vulnerability; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service


More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site prior to European influence. The primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included frequent fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing, coupled with weather events, dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. These factors likely caused the community to shift both spatially and temporally between four community phases that were dominated by mid-statured warm-season and cool-season grasses. Soil disturbances, such as rotational slides (aka “slumping”), may have occurred on slopes after multiyear drought when followed by average to above average precipitation events. These areas tended to become dominated by little bluestem until a severe drought reduced its competitive advantage (Whitman et al. 1943). Prairie dog occupation resulted in a plant community dominated by short-statured grasses, sedges, and annual forbs.
Characteristics and indicators. (i.e., characteristics and indicators that can be used to distinguish this state from others). Because of changes in disturbances and other environmental factors (particularly the widespread occurrence of exotic species), the Reference State is considered to no longer exist.
Resilience management. (i.e., management strategies that will sustain a state and prevent a transition). If intact, the reference state should probably be managed with current disturbance regimes which has permitted the site to remain in reference condition, as well as maintaining the quality and integrity of associated ecological sites. Maintenance of the reference condition is contingent upon a monitoring protocol to guide management.
Community 1.1
Needlegrasses-Little Bluestem-Blue Grama (Hesperostipa spp., Nassella viridula-Schizachyrium scoparium-Bouteloua gracilis)
This community phase was historically the most dominant both temporally and spatially. It was dominated by mid-statured grasses (such as needle and thread, western wheatgrass, little bluestem, and sideoats grama). There were also other needlegrasses and wheatgrasses present, as well as small amounts of other cool-season and warm-season grasses (such as blue grama, plains reedgrass, and prairie Junegrass). A variety of leguminous and non-leguminous perennial forbs were present, but only in slight amounts. Common forbs and shrubs included blacksamson echinacea, blazing star, prairie clover, prairie sagewort, rose, and winterfat. Annual production likely varied from about 800-2000 pounds per acre with grasses and grass-likes, forbs, and shrubs contributing about 85%, 10% and 5%, respectively. Both warm-season and cool- season grasses were well represented in the community; as a result, production was distributed throughout the growing season. This community represents the plant community phase upon which interpretations are primarily based and is described in the “Plant Community Composition and Group Annual Production” portion of this ecological site description.
Figure 9. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 710 | 1240 | 1765 |
Forb | 65 | 105 | 145 |
Shrub/Vine | 25 | 50 | 75 |
Moss | 0 | 5 | 15 |
Total | 800 | 1400 | 2000 |
Figure 10. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ND5803, Northern Rolling Plains cool season dominant, warm-season sub-dominant. Cool-season subdominant, warm season..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
5 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Community 1.2
Needlegrasses-Western Wheatgrass-Blue Grama/Sedges (Hesperostipa spp., Nassella viridula-Pascopyrum smithii-Bouteloua gracilis/Carex spp.)
This plant community resulted from of multiyear drought with or without heavy long-term grazing, resulting in a decrease in the cool-season mid-statured bunchgrasses. Needle and thread and western wheatgrass were the dominant species, with the appearance of this phase sometimes shifting from a blue grama-western wheatgrass to a western wheatgrass-blue grama. Other grasses and grass-likes included sedges, prairie Junegrass, and annual grasses. Forbs (such as Cuman ragweed, Indian breadroot, Indian breadroot, white sagebrush, and scarlet globemallow) may also have been present. Annual production would have decreased to 85-95 percent of that of Community Phase 1.1. Evidence from the years 1932-1941 indicates multiyear drought can result in major shifts in species composition. Blue grama, needle and thread, western wheatgrass, prairie Junegrass, and needleleaf sedge were reduced in density and abundance during one or two seasons of severe drought. Of the major species, only threadleaf sedge maintained approximately the same area. Blue grama and western wheatgrass were the most severely affected and required three to four years to fully recover. Little bluestem, prairie sandreed, and plains muhly were seriously reduced during the two drought years and did not fully recover from the drought effects. Sandberg’s bluegrass increased remarkably during the drought years but decreased during post-drought years due to competition from threadleaf sedge, needle and thread, prairie Junegrass, and needleleaf sedge which recovered to pre-drought levels. The height of all species was reduced (Whitman et.al. 1943).
Community 1.3
Little Bluestem-Needle and Thread/Sedges (Schizachyrium scoparium, Hesperostipa comata/Carex spp.)
This community phase can be characterized by an increase in little bluestem resulting from soil disturbances (such as soil erosion, soil deposition, and large herbivore trailing). Soil disturbance coupled with high calcium carbonates provided a competitive advantage to little bluestem, as it tends to act as an invader on disturbed areas. Large herbivores typically avoid little bluestem; the lack of grazing preference likely acted as a driver to further favor the plants abundance once it became established. As the steps or slump(s) widen, they unite with other steps or slumps and become deeper as erosion extends up the slope (Whitman et.al. 1943). Little bluestem dominated the site, with lesser amounts of needle and thread, western wheatgrass, sedges and forbs. Once little bluestem becomes dominant, it is difficult for other grasses to displace it because of its dense, tall growth provided soil moisture is adequate. Moisture conditions below the step were more favorable than on the general slope because snow tended to accumulate; runoff was retarded. As the step widened, united with other steps, and became deeper as erosion extended up the slope, the area of little bluestem enlarged until it occupied most of the hillside. Once established, the cover of little bluestem usually protected the slopes from excessive runoff and erosion. Little bluestem is of great ecological importance here because it stabilizes areas subject to heavy runoff and erosion, holds drifting snow, and hastens soil development because of the numerous roots to 3.5 feet in depth and large volume of herbage. In places, little bluestem appears to be rather short-lived and to be succeeded on more moderate slopes by blue grama, western wheatgrass, needlegrasses, and sedges. These areas tend to remain dominated by little bluestem until a severe drought reduces its competitive advantage (Whitman et.al. 1943). See Plant Community Pathway 1.3A.
Community 1.4
Blue Grama/Bare Ground/Annual Forbs/Sedges (Bouteloua gracilis/Bare Ground/Annual Forbs/Carex spp.)
This community phase formed during periods of long-term occupation by prairie dogs. It was characterized by the abundance of annual forbs (e.g., fetid marigold, woolly plantain), blue grama, and bare ground. Some perennial native species remained but were greatly reduced in vigor and may not have been readily visible.
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.2 occurred with multiyear drought with or without heavy long-term grazing resulting in decreases of cool-season bunchgrasses and increases of cool-season rhizomatous grasses, short-statured warm-season grasses, and sedges.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3
Community Phase Pathway 1.1 to 1.3 was initiated following events resulting in a reduction in plant cover, increased bare ground, and increased rates of soil erosion and deposition due to wind and/or water erosion (e.g., periods of reduced moisture or periods of severe, multiyear drought and larger herbivore trailing). Naturally occurring soil slumping on slopes (“steps”) may also have contributed to increases in bare ground. Soil disturbance resulted in elevated calcium carbonate levels at the soil surface which further favored an increase in little bluestem.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Community Phase Pathway 1.2 to 1.1 occurred with the return to average precipitation and reduced grazing resulting in increases of cool-season bunchgrasses and decreases in cool- season rhizomatous grasses, short-statured warm-season grasses, and sedges.
Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.4
Community Phase Pathway 1.2 to 1.4 occurred with long-term occupation by prairie dogs, resulting in a marked increase in bare ground with the vegetation becoming dominated blue grama, annual forbs, and sedges.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.2
Community Phase Pathway 1.3 to 1.2 occurred with multiyear drought, resulting in a marked decrease in little bluestem and corresponding increases in western wheatgrass, blue grama, and sedges.
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.2
Community Phase Pathway 1.4 to 1.2 occurred with the abandonment of prairie dogs, return to average precipitation, and reduced grazing. This resulted in marked increases in perennial grasses and forbs along with corresponding decreases in annual forbs, bare ground, and blue grama..
State 2
Native / Invaded State
This state is similar to State 1: Reference State but has now been colonized by the exotic cool-season grasses (commonly Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass) which are now present in small amounts. Although the state is still dominated by native grasses, an increase in these exotic cool-season grasses can be expected. These exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive on the site and are particularly well adapted to heavy grazing. They also often form monotypic stands. As these exotic cool-season grasses increase, both forage quantity and quality become increasingly restricted to late spring and early summer due to the monotypic nature of the stand, even though annual production may increase. Native forbs generally decrease in production, abundance, diversity, and richness compared to that of State 1: Reference State. These exotic cool-season grasses have been particularly and consistently invasive under extended periods of non-use and no fire. To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. If management does not include measures to control or reduce these exotic cool-season grasses, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected. Annual production of this state can be quite variable, in large part due to the amount of exotic cool- season grasses. However, as the exotic cool-season grasses increase, peak production will shift to earlier in the growing season.
Characteristics and indicators. (i.e., characteristics that can be used to distinguish this state from others). The presence of trace amounts of exotic cool-season grasses indicates a transition from State 1 to State 2. The presence of exotic biennial or perennial leguminous forbs (i.e., sweet clover, black medic) may not, on their own, indicate a transition from State 1 to State 2 but may facilitate that transition.
Resilience management. (i.e., management strategies that will sustain a state and prevent a transition). To slow or limit the invasion of these exotic grasses, it is imperative that managerial techniques (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) be carefully constructed, monitored, and evaluated with respect to that objective. Grazing management should be applied that enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. This may include: (1) early spring grazing when exotic cool-season grasses are actively growing and native cool-season grasses are dormant; (2) applying proper deferment periods allowing native grasses to recover and maintain or improve vigor; (3) adjusting overall grazing intensity to reduce excessive plant litter (above that needed for rangeland health indicator #14 – see Rangeland Health Reference Worksheet); (4) incorporating early heavy spring utilization which focuses grazing on exotic cool-season grasses and reduces plant litter, provided that livestock are moved when grazing selection shifts from exotic cool-season grasses to native grasses. Prescribed burning should be applied in a manner that maintains or enhances the competitive advantage of native grass and forb species. Prescribed burns should be applied as needed to adequately reduce/remove excessive plant litter and maintain the competitive advantage for native species. Timing of prescribed burns (spring vs. summer vs. fall) should be adjusted to account for differences in annual growing conditions and applied during windows of opportunity to best shift the competitive advantage to the native species.
Community 2.1
Needlegrasses-Little Bluestem/Shrubs/Blue Grama (Hesperostipa spp., Nassella viridula-Schizachyrium scoparium/Shrubs/Bouteloua gracilis)

Figure 11. Community Phase 2.1: Needlegrasses-Little Bluestem/Shrubs/Blue Grama
This community phase is similar to Community Phase 1.1 but has been colonized by exotic cool- season grasses (often Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass). However, these exotics are present in smaller amounts with the community still dominated by native grasses. The community typically has an increased shrub component, in part due to reduced fire frequency. Common shrubs include prairie sagewort and prairie rose. Annual production may be comparable to that of Community Phase 1.1 (800-2000 pounds per acre). However, as the exotic cool-season grasses increase, peak production will shift to earlier in the growing season.
Community 2.2
Needlegrasses-Western Wheatgrass-Blue Grama/Sedges (Hesperostipa spp., Nassella viridula-Pascopyrum smithii-Bouteloua gracilis/Carex spp.)
This community phase is similar to Community Phase 1.2 but has now been colonized by exotic cool- season grasses (often Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass). These exotics, however, are present in smaller amounts with the community still dominated by native grasses. This community phase is often dispersed throughout a pasture in an overgrazed/ undergrazed pattern, typically referred to as patch grazing. Some overgrazed areas will exhibit the impacts of heavy use, while the ungrazed areas will have a build-up of litter and increased plant decadence. This is a typical pattern found in properly stocked pastures grazed season-long. As a result, Kentucky bluegrass tends to increase more in the undergrazed areas while the more grazing tolerant short statured species, such as blue grama and sedges, increase in the heavily grazed areas. If present, Kentucky bluegrass may increase under heavy grazing. Increasing amounts of exotic cool-season grasses, particularly Kentucky bluegrass, can make this an “at risk” community, even though its presence may not be obvious. If management does not include measures to control or reduce Kentucky bluegrass, the transition to State 3: Invaded State should be expected.
Community 2.3
Little Bluestem-Needle and Thread/Shrubs/Sedges (Schizachyrium scoparium, Hesperostipa comata/Shrubs/Carex spp.)
This community phase is similar to Community Phase 1.3 and can be characterized by an increase in little bluestem resulting from soil disturbances (such as soil erosion, soil deposition, and large herbivore trailing). As the steps or slump(s) widen, they unite with other steps or slumps and become deeper as erosion extends up the slope (Whitman et al. 1943). The community typically has an increased shrub component, in part due to reduced fire frequency. Common shrubs often include prairie sagewort and prairie rose. Soil disturbance, coupled with high calcium carbonate content, gives the competitive advantage to little bluestem as it tends to act as an invader on disturbed areas. Livestock typically avoid little bluestem; the lack of grazing preference may act as a driver to further favor this plant’s abundance once it becomes established. The deep-rooted nature of little bluestem stabilizes soil on slopes and can act as a snow trap allowing the site to collect additional moisture. These areas tend to remain dominated by little bluestem until a severe drought reduces its competitive advantage (Whitman et al. 1943).
Community 2.4
Blue Grama/Bare Ground/Annual Forbs/Sedges (Bouteloua gracilis/Bare Ground/Annual Forbs/Carex spp.)
This community phase forms during periods of long-term occupation by prairie dogs and may be facilitated by extended periods of heavy grazing. The community can be characterized by the abundance of blue grama, bare ground, and annual forbs (e.g., fetid marigold, woolly plantain). Some perennial native species remained but are greatly reduced in vigor and may not be readily visible.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2
Community Phase Pathway 2.1 to 2.2 occurs with heavy grazing with or without drought. This results in decreases of cool-season bunchgrasses and increases of cool-season rhizomatous grasses, short- statured warm-season grasses, and sedges.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1
Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.1 occurs with implementation of long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning and return to average precipitation. This results in increases of cool-season bunchgrasses and decreases in cool-season rhizomatous grasses, short-statured warm-season grasses, and sedges.
Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.3
Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.3 was initiated following events resulting in a reduction in plant cover, increased bare ground, and increased rates of soil erosion and deposition due to wind and/or water erosion (e.g., periods of reduced moisture or periods of severe, multiyear drought and larger herbivore trailing). Naturally occurring soil slumping on slopes (“steps”) may also have contributed to increases in bare ground. Soil disturbance resulted in elevated calcium carbonate levels at the soil surface which further favored an increase in little bluestem.
Pathway 2.2C
Community 2.2 to 2.4
Community Phase Pathway 2.2 to 2.4 occurs with long-term occupation by prairie dogs. This results in a marked increase in bare ground with the vegetation becoming dominated by blue grama, annual forbs, and sedges.
Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.2
Community Phase Pathway 2.3 to 2.2 occurs with multiyear drought, resulting in a marked decrease in little bluestem and corresponding increases in western wheatgrass, blue grama, and sedges.
Pathway 2.4A
Community 2.4 to 2.2
Community Phase Pathway 2.4 to 2.2 occurs with the removal or abandonment of prairie dogs. This results in marked increases in perennial grasses and forbs along with corresponding decreases in annual forbs, bare ground, and blue grama
State 3
Invaded State
This state is the result of invasion and dominance by the exotic cool-season grasses (commonly Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass). Other exotic plants (e.g., leafy spurge) may also invade the site. These exotic cool-season grasses can be quite invasive on the site and are particularly well adapted to heavy grazing. They also often form monotypic stands. As these exotic cool-season grasses increase, both forage quantity and quality become increasingly restricted to late spring and early summer due to the monotypic nature of the stand, even though annual production may increase. Native forbs generally decrease in production, abundance, diversity, and richness compared to that of State 1: Reference State. Common forbs often include white heath aster, goldenrod, common yarrow, and white sagebrush. Shrubs (e.g., rose) may show marked increases. Once the state is well established, prescribed burning and grazing techniques have been largely ineffective in suppressing or eliminating these species, even though some short-term reductions may appear successful. Annual production of this state may vary widely, in part due to variations in the extent of invasion by exotic cool-season grasses. However, as the exotic cool-season grasses increase, peak production will shift to earlier in the growing season.
Characteristics and indicators. (i.e., characteristics that can be used to distinguish this state from others). This site is characterized by exotic cool-season grasses constituting greater than 30 percent of the annual production and native grasses constituting less than 40 percent of the annual production.
Resilience management. (i.e., management strategies that will sustain a state and prevent a transition). Light or moderately stocked continuous, season-long grazing or a prescribed grazing system which incorporates adequate deferment periods between grazing events and proper stocking rate levels will maintain this State. Application of herbaceous weed treatment, occasional prescribed burning and/or brush management may be needed to manage noxious weeds and increasing shrub (e.g., western snowberry) populations.
Community 3.1
Exotic Cool-Season Grasses/Forbs/Shrubs
This community phase is dominated by exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass), often with a conspicuous forb and shrub component. Excessive accumulation of mulch may also be present, particularly when dominated by Kentucky bluegrass. Common forbs and shrubs often include white sagebrush, silverleaf Indian breadroot, blacksamson echinacea, prairie sagewort, and rose. Other exotic plants (e.g., leafy spurge) may also invade the site. The longer this community phase exists, the more resilient it becomes. Natural or management disturbances that reduce the cover of Kentucky bluegrass or smooth brome are typically short-lived.
State 4
Go-Back State
This state is highly variable depending on the level and duration of disturbance related to the T5A transitional pathway. In this MLRA, the most probable origin of this state is plant succession following cropland abandonment. This plant community will initially include a variety of annual forbs and grasses, some of which may be noxious weeds and need control. Over time, the exotic cool-season grasses (Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass) will likely predominate.
Characteristics and indicators. (i.e., characteristics that can be used to distinguish this state from others). Tillage has destroyed the native plant community, altered soil structure and biology, reduced soil organic matter, and resulted in the formation of a tillage induced compacted layer which is restrictive to root growth. Removal of perennial grasses and forbs results in decreased infiltration and increased runoff.
Resilience management. (i.e., management strategies that will sustain a state and prevent a transition). Continued tillage will maintain the state. Control of noxious weeds will be required.
Community 4.1
Annual/Pioneer Perennial /Exotics
This community phase is highly variable depending on the level and duration of disturbance related to the T5A transitional pathway. In this MLRA, the most probable origin of this phase is secondary succession following cropland abandonment. This plant community will initially include a variety of annual forbs and grasses, including noxious weeds (e.g., Canada thistle) which may need control. Over time, the exotic cool-season grasses (e.g., Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass) will likely predominate.
State 5
Any Plant Community
Plant community resulting from annually cropping.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
This is the transition from the State 1: Reference State to the State 2: Native/Invaded State due to the introduction and establishment of exotic cool-season grasses (typically Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and/or crested wheatgrass). This transition was probably inevitable and corresponded to a decline in native warm-season and cool-season grasses; it may have been exacerbated by chronic season-long or heavy late season grazing. Complete rest from grazing and suppression of fire could also have hastened the transition. The threshold between states was crossed when Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, crested wheatgrass, or other exotic species became established on the site.
Constraints to recovery. (i.e., variables or processes that preclude recovery of the former state). Current knowledge and technology will not facilitate a successful restoration to Reference State.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
Complete rest or low intensity (<20 percent utilization) grazing and elimination of fire are the two major contributors to this transition, especially when exotic cool-season grasses are present. Preliminary studies indicate this threshold may exist when exotic cool-season grasses exceed 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2
This restoration pathway from State 3: Invaded State to State 2: Native/Invaded State may be accomplished with the implementation of long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning, assuming there is an adequate component of native grasses to respond to the treatments. If not, a subsequent range planting may be necessary to complete the restoration. Both prescribed grazing and prescribed burning are likely necessary to successfully initiate this restoration pathway, the success of which depends upon the presence of a remnant population of native grasses in Community Phase 3.1. That remnant population, however, may not be readily apparent without close inspection. The application of several prescribed burns may be needed at relatively short intervals in the early phases of this restoration process, in part because some shrubs sprout following one burn. Early season prescribed burns have been successful; however, fall burning may also be an effective technique. The prescribed grazing should include adequate recovery periods following each grazing event and stocking levels which match the available resources. If properly implemented, this will shift the competitive advantage from the exotic cool-season grasses to the native cool-season grasses.
Context dependence. This restoration pathway from State 3: Invaded State to State 2: Native/Invaded State may be accomplished with the implementation of long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning, assuming there is an adequate component of native grasses to respond to the treatments. If not, a subsequent range planting may be necessary to complete the restoration. Both prescribed grazing and prescribed burning are likely necessary to successfully initiate this restoration pathway, the success of which depends upon the presence of a remnant population of native grasses in Community Phase 3.1. That remnant population, however, may not be readily apparent without close inspection. The application of several prescribed burns may be needed at relatively short intervals in the early phases of this restoration process, in part because some shrubs sprout following one burn. Early season prescribed burns have been successful; however, fall burning may also be an effective technique. The prescribed grazing should include adequate recovery periods following each grazing event and stocking levels which match the available resources. If properly implemented, this will shift the competitive advantage from the exotic cool-season grasses to the native cool-season grasses.
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 2
This Restoration Pathway from State 4: Go-Back State to the State 2: Native/Invaded State can be accomplished with a successful range planting. Following planting, long-term prescribed grazing and prescribed burning, haying, or use of herbicides will generally be necessary to achieve the desired result and control any noxious weeds. It may be possible using selected plant materials and agronomic practices to approach something very near the functioning of State 2: Native/Invaded State. Application of chemical herbicides and the use of mechanical seeding methods using adapted varieties of the dominant native grasses are possible and can be successful. After establishment of the native plant species, prescribed grazing should include adequate recovery periods following each grazing event and stocking levels which match the available resources; management objectives must include the maintenance of those species, the associated reference state functions, and continued treatment of exotic grasses.
Context dependence. (i.e., factors that cause variations in plant community shifts, restoration likelihood, and contribute to uncertainty). A successful range planting will include proper seedbed preparation, weed control (both prior to and after the planting), selection of adapted native species representing functional/structural groups inherent to the State 1, and proper seeding technique. Management (e.g., prescribed grazing, prescribed burning) during and after establishment must be applied in a manner that maintains the competitive advantage for the seeded native species. Adding non-native species can impact the above and below ground biota. Elevated soil nitrogen levels have been shown to benefit smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass more than some native grasses. As a result, fertilization, exotic legumes in the seeding mix, and other techniques that increase soil nitrogen may promote smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass invasion. The method or methods of herbaceous weed treatment will be site specific to each situation; but generally, the goal would be to apply the pesticide, mechanical control, or biological control (either singularly or in combination) in a manner that shifts the competitive advantage from the targeted species to the native grasses and forbs. The control method(s) should be as specific to the targeted species as possible to minimize impacts to non-target species.
Restoration pathway R4B
State 4 to 3
A failed range planting and/or secondary succession will lead to State 3: Invaded State.
Context dependence. (i.e., factors that cause variations in plant community shifts, restoration likelihood, and contribute to uncertainty). Failed range plantings can result from many causes (both singularly and in combination) including drought, poor seedbed preparation, improper seeding methods, seeded species not adapted to the site, insufficient weed control, herbicide carryover, poor seed quality (purity & germination), and/or improper management.
Transition T5A
State 5 to 4
This transition from any plant community to State 4: Go-Back State. It is most commonly associated with the cessation of cropping without the benefit of range planting, resulting in a “go-back” situation. Soil conditions can be quite variable on the site, in part due to variations in the management/cropping history (e.g., development of a tillage induced compacted layer (plow pan), erosion, fertility, herbicide/pesticide carryover). Thus, soil conditions should be assessed when considering restoration techniques.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Cool-Season Grasses | 240–560 | ||||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 98–196 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 70–140 | – | ||
green needlegrass | NAVI4 | Nassella viridula | 70–140 | – | ||
plains reedgrass | CAMO | Calamagrostis montanensis | 14–28 | – | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTRT | Elymus trachycaulus ssp. trachycaulus | 14–28 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 14–28 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 14–28 | – | ||
2 | Warm-Season Grasses | 280–630 | ||||
little bluestem | SCSC | Schizachyrium scoparium | 70–280 | – | ||
plains muhly | MUCU3 | Muhlenbergia cuspidata | 70–210 | – | ||
sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 70–140 | – | ||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 42–70 | – | ||
Fendler threeawn | ARPUL | Aristida purpurea var. longiseta | 14–28 | – | ||
3 | Other Native Perennials | 14–140 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 0–70 | – | ||
porcupinegrass | HESP11 | Hesperostipa spartea | 0–70 | – | ||
prairie sandreed | CALO | Calamovilfa longifolia | 0–70 | – | ||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 0–42 | – | ||
saltgrass | DISP | Distichlis spicata | 0–14 | – | ||
4 | Grass-Likes | 14–70 | ||||
threadleaf sedge | CAFI | Carex filifolia | 70–98 | – | ||
Grass-like (not a true grass) | 2GL | Grass-like (not a true grass) | 0–14 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
5 | Forbs | 70–140 | ||||
purple prairie clover | DAPU5 | Dalea purpurea | 28–42 | – | ||
blacksamson echinacea | ECAN2 | Echinacea angustifolia | 28–42 | – | ||
dotted blazing star | LIPU | Liatris punctata | 28–42 | – | ||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 14–28 | – | ||
wavyleaf thistle | CIUN | Cirsium undulatum | 14–28 | – | ||
blanketflower | GAAR | Gaillardia aristata | 14–28 | – | ||
stiff sunflower | HEPA19 | Helianthus pauciflorus | 14–28 | – | ||
rush skeletonplant | LYJU | Lygodesmia juncea | 14–28 | – | ||
lacy tansyaster | MAPI | Machaeranthera pinnatifida | 14–28 | – | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 14–28 | – | ||
Indian breadroot | PEDIO2 | Pediomelum | 14–28 | – | ||
eastern pasqueflower | PUPA5 | Pulsatilla patens | 14–28 | – | ||
goldenrod | SOLID | Solidago | 14–28 | – | ||
scarlet globemallow | SPCO | Sphaeralcea coccinea | 14–28 | – | ||
white heath aster | SYER | Symphyotrichum ericoides | 14–28 | – | ||
Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 2FORB | Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 0–28 | – | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 0–14 | – | ||
tarragon | ARDR4 | Artemisia dracunculus | 0–14 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLU | Artemisia ludoviciana | 0–14 | – | ||
groundplum milkvetch | ASCR2 | Astragalus crassicarpus | 0–14 | – | ||
plains milkvetch | ASGI5 | Astragalus gilviflorus | 0–14 | – | ||
curlycup gumweed | GRSQ | Grindelia squarrosa | 0–14 | – | ||
scarlet beeblossom | OESU3 | Oenothera suffrutescens | 0–14 | – | ||
purple locoweed | OXLA3 | Oxytropis lambertii | 0–14 | – | ||
large Indian breadroot | PEES | Pediomelum esculentum | 0–14 | – | ||
upright prairie coneflower | RACO3 | Ratibida columnifera | 0–14 | – | ||
American vetch | VIAM | Vicia americana | 0–14 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
6 | Shrubs | 14–70 | ||||
prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 14–28 | – | ||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 14–28 | – | ||
prairie rose | ROAR3 | Rosa arkansana | 14–28 | – | ||
skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 0–28 | – | ||
Shrub (>.5m) | 2SHRUB | Shrub (>.5m) | 0–28 | – | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–14 | – | ||
broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–14 | – | ||
creeping juniper | JUHO2 | Juniperus horizontalis | 0–14 | – | ||
plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | 0–14 | – | ||
Moss
|
||||||
7 | Cryptogams | 0–14 | ||||
lesser spikemoss | SEDE2 | Selaginella densa | 0–14 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Animal Community – Wildlife Interpretations
Landscape
The MLRA 54 landscape is characterized by old, moderately dissected rolling plains with areas of local badlands, buttes, and isolated hills. MLRA 54 is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are common and characteristic of MLRA 54. This area supports natural mixed-grass prairie vegetation with prairie rose, leadplant, and patches of western snowberry interspersed throughout the area. Green ash, chokecherry, and buffaloberry occur in draws and narrow valleys, creating woody riparian corridors. Complex and intermingled ecological sites create diverse grass and shrub land habitats interspersed with varying densities linear, slope, depressional, and in-stream wetlands associated with headwater streams and tributaries to the Missouri River. These habitats provide critical life-cycle components for many wildlife species.
Historic Communities/Conditions within MLRA:
The northern mixed-grass prairie was a disturbance-driven ecosystem with fire, herbivory, and climate functioning as the primary ecological drivers, either singly or often in combination. Many species of grassland birds, small mammals, insects, reptiles, amphibians, and herds of roaming American bison, elk, and pronghorn were historically among the inhabitants adapted to this semi-arid region. Roaming herbivores, as well as several small mammal and insect species, were the primary consumers linking the grassland resources to large predators such as the wolf, mountain lion, and grizzly bear and smaller carnivores such as the coyote, bobcat, red fox, and raptors. The black-tailed prairie dog was once abundant and provided ecological services by manipulating the plant and soil community providing habitat for the black-footed ferret, burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, mountain plover, swift fox, small mammals, and amphibians and reptiles. Extirpated species include free-ranging American bison, grizzly bear, gray wolf, black-footed ferret, mountain plover, and peregrine falcon (breeding). Extinct from the region is the Rocky Mountain locust.
Present Communities/Conditions within MLRA:
Following European influence, domestic livestock grazing, elimination of fire, energy development, and other anthropogenic factors influenced plant community composition and abundance. Agriculture, transportation corridors, and energy development are the main factors that contribute to habitat fragmentation, which reduces habitat quality for area-sensitive species. These influences fragmented the landscape, reduced or eliminated ecological drivers (fire), and introduced exotic plant species including smooth brome, crested wheatgrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and leafy spurge, further impacting plant and animal communities. The loss of the bison, black-tailed prairie dogs, and fire as primary ecological drivers greatly influenced the character of the remaining native plant communities and the associated wildlife moving towards a less diverse and more homogeneous landscape.
Included in this MLRA are the isolated Killdeer Mountains containing bur oak, quaking aspen, green ash, paper birch, river birch, and American elm. Except for floodplain forests within the MRLA, the Killdeer Mountains contain the largest deciduous forest in southwestern North Dakota.
Some wildlife species in this area are mule deer, white-tailed deer, elk, pronghorn, coyote, red fox, and bobcat. The area also is home to the prairie rattlesnake, American badger, raccoon, North American porcupine, beaver, striped skunk, American mink, and the white-tailed jackrabbit. Black-tailed prairie dog, Eastern and Merriam’s turkey, golden eagle, ferruginous hawks, sharp-tailed grouse, greater prairie-chicken, and black-billed magpie are also in this ecological site, along with numerous species of grassland-nesting birds and pollinating insects.
The presence of wildlife species is often determined by ecological site characteristics, including grass and forb species, hydrology, aspect, and other associated ecological sites. Home ranges of most species are larger than one ecological site or are dependent upon more than one ecological site for annual life requisites. Ecological sites offer different habitat elements as the annual life requisites change. Habitat improvement and creation must be conducted within the mobility limits of a known population for the species.
Insects play an important role providing ecological services for plant community development. Insects that are scavengers or aid in decomposition provide the food chain baseline sustaining the carnivorous insects feeding upon them. Many insects provide the ecological services necessary for pollination, keeping plant communities healthy and productive. Insects provide a protein food source for numerous species, including grassland-nesting birds and their young.
Species unique to MLRA 54:
Bald Eagle: Bald Eagles prefer large rivers, lakes, reservoirs, or wetlands that are bordered by mature stands of trees or a single large tree. Mature trees, including cottonwoods, provide nesting sites adjacent to aquatic and upland foraging sites.
Dakota skipper: The extreme northern portion of this MLRA provides limited Dakota skipper habitat, which in MLRA 54 is considered Type B habitat. The Type B habitat is described as rolling native-prairie terrain over gravelly glacial moraine deposits dominated by bluestems and needlegrasses with the likely presence of bluebell bellflower, wood lily, purple coneflower, upright prairie coneflower, and blanket flower. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists two critical habitat units within the MLRA in McKenzie County, North Dakota.
Golden eagle: The Lake Sakakawea breaks, bluffs, and rock outcroppings within the northwest portion of the MRLA 54 are key areas for Golden eagle nesting. Grasslands, shrublands, and black-tailed prairie dog towns are used for foraging.
Black-footed ferret: Black-footed ferrets have been reintroduced as an experimental population in the southern portion of the MLRA located on the Cheyenne Sioux Indian Reservation. Since reintroduction between 1991 and 1996, black-footed ferrets have been documented on the Standing Rock Sioux Indian Reservation approximately 20 miles north of the reintroduction site. Black-footed ferrets rely exclusively on prairie dog towns for shelter, breeding, and food sources (prairie dogs and other species within the town).
Least tern (Interior): Least terns are found on the Missouri River system in MLRA 54. Sparsely vegetated sandbars within the free-flowing portions of the Missouri River or shorelines of Lake Oahe and Sakakawea are used for nesting and foraging.
Species of Concern within MLRA 54:
The following is a list of species considered “species of conservation priority” in the North Dakota State Wildlife Action Plan (2015); “species of greatest conservation need” in the Montana State Wildlife Action Plan (2015); and South Dakota State Wildlife Action Plan (2014); and species listed as “threatened, endangered, or petitioned” under the Endangered Species Act within MLRA 54 at the time this section was developed:
Invertebrates: Dakota skipper, little white tiger beetle, monarch butterfly, Ottoe skipper, regal fritillary, yellow-banded bumble bee, and western bumble bee
Birds: American Kestrel, Baird’s sparrow, bald eagle, black-billed cuckoo, black tern, bobolink, Brewer’s sparrow, burrowing owl, chestnut-collared longspur, ferruginous hawk, golden eagle, grasshopper sparrow, greater prairie-chicken, lark bunting, loggerhead shrike, least tern, long-billed curlew, marbled godwit, McCown’s longspur, mountain plover, northern goshawk, northern harrier, northern pintail, peregrine falcon (migration), piping plover, prairie falcon, red-headed woodpecker, red knot (migration), sharp-tailed grouse, short-eared owl, Sprague’s pipit, Swainson’s hawk, trumpeter swan, upland sandpiper, western meadowlark, willet, Wilson’s phalarope, and whooping crane (migration).
Mammals: Big and little brown bats, long-eared bat, long-legged bat, northern long-eared bat, Townsend’s big-eared bat, western small-footed bat, black-footed ferret, black-tailed prairie dog, dwarf shrew, gray wolf, hispid pocket mouse, Merriam’s shrew, northwestern moose, sagebrush vole, silver-haired bat, and swift fox
Amphibians and Reptiles: Common snapping turtle, Great Plains toad, false map turtle, greater short-horned lizard, milk snake, northern leopard frog, plains hognose snake, plains spadefoot, sagebrush lizard, smooth green snake, and smooth softshell and spiny softshell turtle.
Fish and Mussels: Blue sucker, burbot, flathead chub, fragile papershell, northern redbelly dace, paddlefish, pallid sturgeon, pearl dace, pink papershell, shortnose gar, sickle-fin chub, sturgeon chub, and sauger.
Grassland Management for Wildlife in the MLRA
Management activities within the community phase pathways impact wildlife. Community phase, transitional, and restoration pathways are keys to long-term management within each State and between States. Significant inputs must occur to cross the threshold between States (e.g. State 3.0 to 2.0) requiring substantial economic inputs and management (mechanical, reseeding, prescribed fire, woody vegetation removal, grazing intensity, etc.). Timing, intensity, and frequency of these inputs can have dramatic positive or negative effects on local wildlife species. Ranchers and other land managers must always consider the long-term beneficial effects of management on the habitat in comparison to potential short-term negative effects to individuals.
Ecological sites occur as intermingled complexes on the landscape with gradual or sometimes abrupt transitions. Rarely do ecological sites exist in large enough acreage to manage independently. Ecological sites supporting a dominance of herbaceous vegetation (loamy/limy residual) can be located adjacent to ecological sites that support medium to tall shrubs (loamy overflow or shallow). Conversely, ecological sites that are dominated by short- to mid-statured grasses (claypan) can be adjacent to sites with bare soil only supporting a minor amount of short grasses and forbs (thin claypan).
Management of these complex ecological sites can provide a heterogeneous or a homogenous landscape. Grassland bird use reduces as the plant community transitions to a homogenous state. Managers must recognize ecological sites and the complexes in which they occur to properly manage the landscape as a whole. A management regime for one ecological site may negatively impact an adjacent site; e.g., alteration of a grazing regime within a Flat Bottom Wooded Draw ecological site to encourage understory growth may encourage exotic cool-season grasses to increase or dominate an adjacent ecological site.
Life requisites and habitat deficiencies are determined for targeted species. Deficiencies must be addressed along community phase, transitional, and restoration pathways as presented in specific state-and-transition models. Ecological sites should be managed and restored within the site’s capabilities to provide sustainable habitat. Managers also must consider habitat provided by adjacent and intermingled ecological sites for species with home ranges or life requests that cannot be provided by one ecological site.
With populations of many grassland-nesting birds in decline, it is important to maintain these ecological sites in a 1.0 Reference State or the 2.0 Native/Invaded State. Plant communities, optimal for a guild of grassland species, serve as a population source where the birth rate exceeds mortality. Species may use marginal plant communities; however, these sites may function as a population sink where mortality exceeds the birth rate.
Understanding preferred vegetative stature and sensitivity to woody encroachment is necessary to manage for the specific grassland species. Various grass heights may be used for breeding, nesting, foraging, or winter habitat. While most species use varying heights, many have a preferred vegetative stature height. The following chart provides preferred vegetative stature heights and sensitivity to woody vegetation encroachment.
More information:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/54_Shallow_Loamy_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf
Shallow Loamy Wildlife Habitat Interpretation:
Shallow Loamy Ecological Sites are characterized by having weathered bedrock, shale, or strongly cemented silicate within 10 – 20 inches of the soil surface. Associated ecological sites include very shallow, loamy, shallow sandy, claypan, sandy, thin claypan, and limy residual. This complex of ecological sites provides habitat for many edge-sensitive grassland bird species. Shallow Loamy habitat features support nesting and foraging grassland birds, but may be too dense and tall for sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken leks.
Shallow Loamy Ecological Sites may be found in four plant community states (1.0 Reference State, 2.0 Native/Invaded State, 3.0 Invaded State, and 4.0 Go-Back State). Multiple plant community phases exist within States 1.0 and 2.0. These states occur primarily in response to grazing, drought, and non-use. Secondary influences include black-tailed prairie dogs, fire, and anthropogenic disturbances.
Because there is no known restoration pathway from State 2.0 to State 1.0, it is important to intensively manage using tools in State 1.0 and State 2.0 community phase pathways to prevent further plant community degradation along either the T1A Transitional Pathway to Native/Invaded State 2.0 or T2A Transitional Pathway to Invaded State 3.0 thresholds. Native wildlife generally benefits from a heterogeneous grassland, in stature and plant composition, found in Community Phases 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 that include diverse grass and forb species with varying stature and density. As plant communities degrade within State 2.0, warm-season grasses, particularly short-statured grasses, increase while native forbs are reduced. This transition results in reduced stature, increased plant community homogeneity, and reduced insect populations, resulting in a reduction of breeding, nesting, foraging, or winter habitat for grassland birds. When adjacent and intermingled ecological sites undergo the same transition, the result can be an expansive, homogenous landscape.
Success along Restoration Pathway R3A from State 3.0 to State 2.0 is very difficult and is dependent upon presence of a remnant native grass population. This concept also applies to wildlife as the target species must either be present on adjacent State 1.0 or State 2.0 plant communities or ecological sites within the mobility limits of the species. Species with limited mobility, such as Dakota skippers, must exist near the plant community to utilize restored sites. Mobile species, such as grassland-nesting birds, can more easily locate isolated, restored plant communities.
Plant community phases within the State 3.0 show dramatically increased homogeneity of exotic cool-season grasses, and further reduction in native forbs. Reduced forb diversity limits insect populations, negatively affecting foraging opportunities for grassland-nesting birds. Shallow Loamy sites can have pockets of buffaloberry and when in high enough density may impact shrub intolerant grassland nesting birds. Increased exotic-grass litter can limit access to bare ground by nesting insects. A homogenous grassland landscape does not provide quality escape or winter cover. As a result, many species are not able to meet life requisites within State 3.0.
Management along community phase, transition, or restoration pathways should focus upon attainable changes. Short- and long-term monetary costs must be evaluated against short- and long-term ecological services in creating and maintaining habitat of sufficient quality to support a sustainable population.
1.0 Reference State
Community Phase 1.1: Needlegrasses-Little Bluestem-Blue grama: This plant community offers excellent wildlife habitat and every effort should be made to maintain this ecological site within this community phase. This phase retains high functionality through continued maintenance, including prescribed grazing with adequate recovery period as well as prescribed fire. Predominance of grass species in this community favors grazers and mixed-feeders (animals selecting grasses as well as forbs and shrubs). The structural diversity provides habitat for a wide array of migratory and resident birds.
Invertebrates: Insects play a role in maintaining the forb community and provide a forage base for grassland birds, reptiles, and rodents. Ecological services, historically provided by bison, are simulated by domestic livestock. These services include putting plant material and dung in contact with mineral soil to be used by low trophic level consumers such as invertebrate decomposers, scavengers, shredders, predators, herbivores, dung beetles, and fungal-feeders.
This site is potential Dakota skipper habitat in the northern portion of the MLRA since it does provide little bluestem host plant. Regal fritillary habitat is limited due to the rarity of Nuttall's violet and prairie violets. Monarch butterflies may use flowering forbs on this site, however, few milkweed species are found on this site to support breeding and larvae development. The Shallow Loamy ecological site does not provide habitat for the little white tiger beetles, which prefer large, active choppy sands ecological site or sand beaches or for the Ottoe Skipper which prefers mid- to tall-statured grasses. Bumblebees and other native bees utilize forbs as a nectar source and bare ground for nesting sites in bunchgrasses. Prescribed grazing with adequate recovery periods, as well as prescribed fire, to maintain the 1.1 Phase, has little effect on nests of ground-dwelling insects.
Birds: This plant community provides quality nesting, foraging, and escape habitats favored by short- to midgrass-nesting birds. Plant statures may be suitable for burrowing owl and McCown’s longspur, especially during periods of drought or management such as rotational grazing or fire that results in defoliation along Community Phase Pathway 1.1A. The low, scattered shrubs present in the plant community phase should not impact woody vegetation-sensitive bird species.
Grassland birds that prefer mid-grass stature will use this site. In years with reduced precipitation or drought, nesting recruitment may be compromised. This plant community provides suitable areas for sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken leks, nesting, and brood-rearing habitat. Limited stature and diverse prey populations provide good hunting opportunities for grassland raptors.
Mammals: The diversity of grasses and forbs provide high nutrition levels for small and large herbivores including voles, mice, rodents, jackrabbits, pronghorn, and white-tailed deer and mule deer. Short- to moderate-statured provides suitable food and thermal, protective, and escape cover for small herbivores such as the hispid pocket mouse.
Amphibians and Reptiles: This ecological site and associated plant communities provides habitat for smooth green snakes. The Shallow Loamy ecological site can provide habitat for the northern leopard frog and Great Plains toad if freshwater habitat such as stock water ponds are located in or adjacent to the site.
Fish and Mussels: This ecological site is not directly associated with streams, rivers, or water bodies. Associated ecological sites, such as loamy overflow, can receive run-on hydrology from loamy sites. Management on these interconnected sites will have limited, secondary effects on aquatic species.
Community Phase 1.2 Needlegrasses-Western Wheatgrass-Blue Grama/Sedges: Long-term drought with or without heavy grazing, and long-term grazing will switch this plant community from cool-season bunchgrasses to cool-season rhizomatous and grasses and short-statured warm-season grasses.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1; however, long-term, heavy grazing may negatively impact ground-nesting sites for bumble bees, other native bees and other ground-nesting insects due to reduction of forbs, timing of forb flowering, or increased soil compaction.
Birds: This plant community provides quality nesting, foraging, and escape habitats favored by shortgrass-nesting birds. A shift to shorter plant stature along Community Phase Pathway 1.1A benefits McCown’s longspur, chestnut-collared longspur, horned lark, and burrowing owl. Species that prefer midgrass stature will be generally successful with normal to above normal precipitation and a change in management along the 1.2A Community Phase Pathway. In years with reduced precipitation or heavy grazing, nesting recruitment may be compromised for midgrass-nesting species. This plant community provides areas suitable for sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken leks. Moderate cover and diverse prey populations provide good hunting opportunities for grassland raptors.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 1.3 Little Bluestem-Needleandthread/Sedges: Downslope soil movement forms “steps” increasing the amount of calcium carbonate at the soil surface favoring an increase in little bluestem. This plant community occurs in a mosaic with Community Phase 1.1, creating a patchwork landscape.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1. However, this Community Phase provide increased Dakota skipper habitat due to the increased presence of the little bluestem host plant.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians/Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 1.4 Blue Grama/Annual Forbs/Sedges: This plant community phase is characterized by grazing-tolerant species and annual forbs. Continued heavy grazing, short-term prairie dog occupation, or a combination of these disturbances will shift to increased annual forbs with a reduction in perennial grasses. The stature and abundance of perennial forbs are being replaced by short-statured annual forbs. Bare ground increases, litter amounts and infiltration rates decline, while soil surface temperatures increase. This short-statured plant community is resilient, retaining sufficient grazing sensitive native species to return to 1.2 Community Phases via Community Phase Pathway 1.4A.
Invertebrates: A switch to annual forbs from perennial forbs will not have a significant impact to invertebrates, but may reduce season-long nectar-producing plants for pollinators. Season-long nectar sources may be found on adjacent plant communities or ecological sites for mobile species. Increased bare ground provides increased nesting sites for bumble bees and other ground-nesting insects.
Birds: This short-statured phase, driven by short-term prairie dog occupation, is favored by burrowing owls, chestnut-collared longspur, and McCown’s longspur. Prairie dog towns provide abundant prey populations for grassland raptors. The lack of grass and forb stature limits use by many bird species. Long-term prairie dog occupation following Transitional Phase Pathway T1B leads to the 2.0 State with no known return pathway due to the presence of exotic cool-season grasses. Managing this phase along Community Phase Pathway 1.4A can be an economical and successful method to restore high quality habitat for many grassland-nesting birds.
Mammals: Suitable food, thermal, shelter, and escape cover (reduction in litter) for most mammals becomes limited. The loss of diversity of grasses and forbs reduces nutrition levels for small and large herbivores including rodents, white-tailed jackrabbits, and deer. Grazers, such as pronghorn and bison, use prairie dog towns for foraging and loafing. Long-term prairie dog occupation following Community Phase Pathway T1B leads to the 2.0 State with no known return pathway due to the presence of exotic, cool-season grasses. Managing this phase along Community Phase Pathway 1.4A can be an economical and successful method to restore habitat.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
2.0 Native Invaded State
Community Phase 2.1 Needlegrasses-Little Bluestem/Shrubs-Blue Grama: This plant community develops through Transition Pathway T1A, due to changes in management and the presence of exotic, cool-season grasses. The threshold between States 1.0 and 2.0 is crossed when Kentucky bluegrass, crested wheatgrass, smooth brome grass, or other exotic species become established. This plant community phase has a very similar appearance and function to the Reference State of Community 1.1, except it has a minor amount of cool-season exotic grasses and forbs. This phase functions at a high level for native wildlife, therefore, managers should consider the 2.0 community phase pathways to avoid transitioning to State 3.0. Shrubs species tend to be short-statured.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 2.2 Needlegrasses-Western Wheatgrass-Blue grama/Sedges: Continuous, heavy season-long grazing or heavy seasonal grazing, with drought, along Community Phase Pathway 2.1A leads to loss of little bluestem and in increase in sod-forming western wheatgrass shorter-statured grasses, such as blue grama and sedges. Dominated by shorter-stature grasses the diversity of this plant community is reduced. Prescribed grazing with adequate recovery periods along Community Phase Pathway 2.2A is an efficient, effective method to regain the cool-season grass and forb diversity components in Community Phase 2.1.
Invertebrates: The reduction of native forbs and increase in sod-forming grasses limit foraging and nesting sites for all pollinators. Continuous, heavy season-long grazing or heavy seasonal grazing may reduce ground-nesting site availability. Homogeneity of forb species may limit season-long nectar availability.
Birds: Continuous, heavy season-long grazing or heavy seasonal grazing will reduce nesting sites, forage (invertebrates), and cover. A reduced forb component may limit foraging opportunities. The stature is generally short, serving both mid- and short-grass nesting birds.. Species that prefer mid-grass stature generally will be successful with normal to above normal precipitation and a change in management along the 2.2A Community Phase Pathway. In years with reduced precipitation or heavy grazing during the nesting season, use by mid-grass nesting species may be compromised. This plant community provides areas suitable for sharp-tailed grouse lek site development. Limited stature and diverse prey populations provide good hunting opportunities for grassland raptors.
Mammals: Suitable food and thermal, protective, and escape cover (reduction in litter) for most mammals become limited. The loss of diversity of grasses and forbs reduces nutrition levels for small and large herbivores including voles, mice, rodents, jackrabbits, pronghorn, and white-tailed and mule deer.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1
Community Phase 2.3 Little Bluestem-Needleandthread/Shrubs/Sedges: This plant community develops through Community Phase Pathway 2.2b due to events such as wind and/or water erosion, drought, pipeline and road installation and livestock trailing. These soil disturbances result in elevated calcium carbonates at the soil surface favoring an increase in little bluestem.
Invertebrates: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase.1.
Birds: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Mammals: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Amphibians/Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Community Phase 2.4 Blue Grama/Annual Forbs/Sedges: This plant community is a result of ecological services provided by long-term black-tailed prairie dog occupation coupled with the introduction of exotic cool-season grasses and annual forbs along Transitional Pathways T1B and 2.2C. Utilizing one or more tools in Community Phase Pathway 2.4A (e.g., removal of black-tailed prairie dogs, control of exotic perennial forbs, implementation of prescribed grazing) can move this community back to Phase 2.2, but this may require significant management and economic inputs. Black-tailed prairie dogs provide primary ecological services to transition to and maintain Plant Community Phase 2.4.
Invertebrates: The loss of native forb diversity limits use by all pollinators. However, annual and invasive forbs will provide limited seasonal use, dependent upon bloom period. Bare ground, burrows, and short plant stature provide nest sites for bumblebees and other ground-nesting insects. Burrowing owls place dung around their burrow entrance to attract dung beetles and other insects as a food source.
Birds: Burrowing owl and McCown’s longspur rely on the stature and composition this plant community provides. Presence of black-tailed prairie dogs provided diverse prey populations for grassland raptors, including burrowing owls, prairie falcons, and ferruginous hawks. Burrowing owls nest in abandoned prairie dog burrows.
Mammals: Suitable food and thermal, protective, and escape cover (reduction in litter) for most mammals becomes limited. The loss of grass and forb diversity reduces nutrition levels for small and large herbivores including voles, mice, rodents, white-tailed jackrabbits, cottontail rabbits, and deer. Except for black-tailed prairie dogs, this plant community provides little habitat for mid- or small herbivores. Nonetheless, black-tailed prairie dog towns provide important habitat for many mammal species, including small rodents. Grazers such as pronghorn and bison use prairie dog towns for foraging and loafing.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Prairie dog towns provide habitat for both amphibians and reptiles. Tiger salamanders, prairie rattlesnakes, and other snake species will use the burrow systems of prairie dogs for shelter and denning.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
3.0 Invaded State
Community Phase 3.1 Exotic grasses/Forbs/Shrubs: Community Phase Pathway T2A is characterized by non-use or low intensity (<20% utilization) grazing and elimination of fire when exotic cool-season grasses are present as in Community Phase 2.0. This plant community phase is characterized by a dominance (>30%) of exotic cool-season grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass, crested wheatgrass, and smooth bromegrass. Restoration Pathway R3A requires remnant amounts of native warm- (i.e. blue grama, red threeawn, and plains muhly) and cool-season grasses (e.g. needlegrasses, western wheatgrass, and prairie Junegrass) and forbs (e.g. cudweed sagewort, silverleaf scurfpea, and prairie coneflower).
The remnant native community needs frequent prescribed burns and high levels of grazing management targeting the exotic cool-season grasses to improve competitiveness and increase vigor and density. Without intensive management, the remnant native plants will not increase adequately to transition back to State 2.0. Intensified management along the R3A Pathway will have significant short-term negative impacts on wildlife habitat, however, this is necessary to restore long-term native habitat functions.
Invertebrates: Exotic grasses result from non-use or low intensity (<20% utilization) grazing, limits use by beneficial insects provided in States 1.0 and 2.0. Increased litter and lack of grazing leads to limited contact between plant material and mineral soil resulting in a cooler microclimate, which is unfavorable to most insects. Lack of bare soil limits ground-nesting sites for native bees and other ground-nesting insects. The lack of nectar-producing plants limits forage opportunities for bumblebees, regal fritillary, monarch butterfly, and other pollinating species.
Birds: The homogeneous community phase, dominated by exotic plant species, provides limited habitat and life requisites for most obligate grassland-nesting birds. Lack of plant diversity and stature, along with increased litter and the tendency of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth bromegrass to lay down, limits use by many grassland-nesting birds. Litter accumulations reduce use by chestnut-collared and McCown’s longspurs. Burrowing owls may use the site if sufficient burrows of black-tailed prairie dogs or other burrowing mammals. Sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken leks can be found on this exotic cool-season plant-dominated community, however, winter cover must be provided by adjacent ecological sites or plant communities.
Mammals: Black-tailed prairie dog expansion is possible in this plant community phase except were dominated by western snowberry. This community phase provides foraging habitat for pronghorn and deer. Litter accumulation and shrub cover favors thermal, protective, and escape cover for small rodents. However, reduced availability of native grass seed may reduce food availability for species such as the hispid pocket mouse.
Amphibians and Reptiles: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
Fish and Mussels: Provides similar life requisites as Community Phase 1.1.
4.0 Go-Back State
Community Phase 4.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial/: These plant communities are the result of severe soil disturbance such as cropping, recreational activity, or concentrated livestock activity for a prolonged time period. Following cessation of disturbances, the resulting plant community is dominated by early pioneer annual and perennial plant species. Plant species composition and production is highly variable. Weedy plants can provide pollinator habitat along with spring and summer cover for many mammals, birds and their young. Dense weed cover can keep soils moist, increasing insect presence. Tall stature provided by some weeds such as marsh elder and ragweed offer thermal cover and seeds throughout winter.
Successful restoration of native species along Transition Pathway R4B results in a native grass and forb community in State 2.0. Failed restoration to native species through Restoration Pathway R4A results in Invaded State 3.0. The response by wildlife species will be dependent upon plant community composition, vegetative stature, patch size, and management activities, such as prescribed grazing, burning, inter-seeding, haying, or noxious weed control.
Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations
This site is well adapted to managed grazing by domestic livestock. The predominance of herbaceous plants across all plant community phases best lends these sites to grazing by cattle but other domestic grazers with differing diet preferences may also be a consideration depending upon management objectives. Often, the current plant community does not entirely match any particular plant community (as described in the ecological site description). Because of this, a resource inventory is necessary to document plant composition and production. Proper interpretation of this inventory data will permit the establishment of a safe, initial stocking rate for the type and class of animals and level of grazing management. More accurate stocking rate estimates should eventually be calculated using actual stocking rate information and monitoring data.
Grazing levels are noted within the plant community narratives and pathways in reference to grazing prescribed grazing management. “Degree of utilization” is defined as the proportion of the current years forage production that is consumed and/or destroyed by grazing animals (may refer to a single plant species or a portion or all the vegetation). “Grazing utilization” is classified as slight, moderate, full, close, and severe (see the following table for description of each grazing use category). The following utilization levels are also described in the Ranchers Guide to Grassland Management IV. Utilization levels are determined by using the landscape appearance method as outlined in the Interagency Technical Reference “Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements” 1734-3.
Utilization Level % Use Description
Slight (Light) 0-20 Appears practically undisturbed when viewed obliquely. Only choice areas and forage utilized.
Moderate 20-40 Almost all of accessible range shows grazing. Little or no use of poor forage. Little evidence of trailing to grazing.
Full 40-60 All fully accessible ares are grazed. The major sites have key forage species properly utilized (about half taken, half left). Points of concentration with overuse limited to 5 to 10 percent of accessible area.
Close (Heavy) 60-80 All accessible range plainly shows use and major sections closely cropped. Livestock forced to use less desirable forage, considering seasonal preference.
Severe > 80 Key forage species completely used. Low-value forages are dominant.
Hydrological functions
Available water is the principal factor limiting forage production on this site. This site is dominated by soils in hydrologic group D. Infiltration is typically moderate to moderately slow and runoff potential for this site varies from low to very high depending on surface texture, slope percent, and ground cover. In many cases, areas with greater than 75% ground cover have the greatest potential for high infiltration and lower runoff. An example of an exception would be where shortgrasses form a strong sod and dominate the site. Dominance by blue grama, Kentucky bluegrass, and/or smooth bromegrass will result in reduced infiltration and increased runoff. Areas where ground cover is less than 50% have the greatest potential to have reduced infiltration and higher runoff (refer to Section 4, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for runoff quantities and hydrologic curves).
Recreational uses
The largest acreage of public land available for recreation in the MLRA is owned and managed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) within the Little Missouri, Grand River, and Cedar River National Grasslands in South Dakota and the Little Missouri National Grasslands in North Dakota (687,398 acres). These areas are available for hunting, fishing, hiking, camping, horse and bike riding, nature viewing, etc. In addition, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages (40,264 acres) in North and South Dakota with the same recreational opportunities as the USFS lands.
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAE) owns 496,162 acres of land and water located on and adjacent to Lake Sakakawea and Lake Oahe. The North Dakota and South Dakota Game and Fish Departments manage the fisheries resources. These two Missouri River reservoirs provide excellent fishing and water recreation opportunities. In addition, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) manages a national fish hatchery below Garrison Dam.
The USFWS manages 36,858 acres in the National Wildlife Refuge system while the North Dakota and South Dakota wildlife management agencies manage 72,218 acres as wildlife or game management areas. The North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana Department of Trust Lands manage 486,482 acres. These areas provide hunting, bird watching, hiking, and other outdoor recreation opportunities. North Dakota Wildlife Management Areas along the shoreline of Lake Sakakawea and the Missouri River account for 60,000 acres of the approximately 72,218 acres of land managed by the states for wildlife habitat in MLRA 54. Located in the northern portion of the MLRA, the Killdeer Mountain WMA is the largest tract of state-owned land managed for wildlife habitat at approximately 7,000 acres.
The largest refuge managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife service is Lake Ilo National Wildlife Refuge totaling approximately 4,000 acres. United States Bureau of Reclamation manages approximately 11,000 acres at Lake Tschida and 8,460 acres at Bowman-Haley Lake for fish and wildlife habitat. The National Park Service manages the Knife River Indian Village National Historic Site; the North Dakota Historical Society manages the Double Ditch Indian Village site.
Bird watching: Public and private grasslands within MLRA 54 provide essential habitat for prairie- dependent bird species (such as Sprague's pipits, western meadowlark, and Baird's sparrow) along with some of the larger, showy members of the upland prairie include marbled godwits, upland sandpipers, willets, and sharp-tailed grouse. Publicly owned lands provide excellent birding opportunities. MLRA 54 is in the Central Flyway.
Hunting/Fishing: MLRA 54 is a fall destination for thousands of pheasant and upland game bird hunters. This MLRA also provides excellent deer (white-tailed and mule), pronghorn, and coyote hunting opportunities. Lake Sakakawea, Lake Oahe, Lake Tschida, and the Missouri River provide excellent year-round fishing opportunities. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department and South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks manage approximately 40 fishing lakes within the MLRA. Available species include yellow perch, walleye, northern pike, muskellunge, crappie, bluegill, rainbow trout, and smallmouth bass. Chinook salmon are stocked in Lake Sakakawea.
Camping: Numerous state operated campgrounds are located along the shores of Lake Sakakawea, Lake Oahe, Missouri River, and Shadehill Reservoir. Primitive camping is allowed on Grand River and Cedar River National Grasslands in South Dakota and the Little Missouri National Grasslands in North Dakota. Other numerous camping (primitive and improved) sites are available in numerous city and county parks.
Hiking/Biking/Horseback Riding: Hiking is permitted on most state and federally owned lands. Developed hiking and biking trails can be found on Harmon Lake (13.1 miles), Roughrider Trail (Morton County, 16.5 miles), Missouri River State Natural Area (5 miles), Ft. Abraham Lincoln State Park (8 miles), Cross Ranch State Park (14 miles), Grand River National Grasslands (7 miles), Lake Sakakawea State Park (5 miles), and Lewis & Clark State Park (5 miles). In addition, extensive biking and walking trails are found in local county and city parks. Ft. Abraham Lincoln State Park has 6 miles of horseback trails.
Wood products
No appreciable wood products are found on this site.
Other products
Seed harvest of native plant species can provide additional income on this site.
Other information
Site Development and Testing Plan
• Further investigation is needed on areas with steep or very steep slopes. Slopes range to 70 percent. Effective precipitation is less due to greater runoff as slope increases. Investigation and documentation of the plant communities and biomass production on Shallow Loamy ecological sites with steep and very steep slopes is recommended.
• Further investigation is recommended on soils with silicrete duripans (Farfeld and Sinnigam) Documentation of the plant communities would useful. Also, Sinnigam was established in Cascade County, MT and, as used in ND, appears outside the central series concept as far as parent materials.
• Further evaluation and refinement of the State-and-Transition model may be needed to identify disturbance driven dynamics. Additional states and/or phases may be required to address grazing response.
• Further documentation may be needed for plant communities in all states. Plant data has been collected in previous range-site investigations, including clipping data; however, this data needs review. If geo-referenced sites meeting Tier 3 standards for either vegetative or soil data are not available, representative sites will be selected for further investigation.
• Site concepts will be refined as the above noted investigations are completed.
• NASIS revisions needed:
o One minor Reeder component needs to be relinked from Shallow Loamy to Loamy.
This ESD is the best available knowledge. The site concept and species composition table have been used in the field and tested for more than five years. It is expected that as additional information becomes available revisions may be required.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS and other federal/state agency clipping and inventory data. Also, field knowledge of range-trained personnel was used. All descriptions were peer reviewed and/or field-tested by various private, state and federal agency specialists.
Other references
Bakker, K.K. 2003. The effect of woody vegetation on grassland nesting birds: an annotated bibliography. The Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 82:119-141.
Barker, W.T. and W. C. Whitman. 1988. Vegetation of the northern great plains. Rangelands 10(6): 266-272.
Bjustad, Ardell J. 1965. Vegetation measurements in relation to range condition classification on the principal range sites of southwestern North Dakota. PhD Thesis. N D State University.
Bluemle, John. North Dakota Notes No. 13, North Dakota’s mountainous areas: the Killdeer Mountains and the Turtle Mountains. Accessed on web, April 10, 2017, at https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/ndnotes/ndn15-h.htm.
Brand, M. D. and H. Goetz. 1986. Vegetation of exclosures in southwestern North Dakota. Journal of Range Management 39: 434-437.
DeKeyser, Shawn, G. Clambey, K. Krabbenhoft and J. Ostendorf. 2009. Are changes in species composition on central North Dakota rangelands due to non-use management? Rangelands 31(6):16-19.
Dodd, J.L. 1970. Distribution and community site relations of bluebunch wheatgrass in North Dakota. PhD Thesis. N D State University. Fargo, North Dakota.
Dyke, S. R., S. K. Johnson, and P.T. Isakson. 2015. North Dakota state wildlife action plan - ND Game and Fish Department.
Ehrenfeld, Joan G. 2002. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503-523.
Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; designation of critical habitat for the Dakota skipper and Poweshiek skipperling; Vol. 79 No. Final Rule October 1, 2015, 50 CFR Part 17.
Field, A., K. Sedivec, J. Hendrickson, P. Johnson, B. Geaumont, L. Xan, R. Gates, and R. Limb. 2016. Effects of Short-Term Cattle Exclusion on Plant Community Composition: Prairie Dog and Ecological Ste Influences. Rangelands 38(1) pp 34-37.
Flesland, J.R. 1964. Composition and structure of the salt-desert shrub type in the Badlands of western North Dakota. M.S. Thesis. ND State University.
Gilgert, W.; and S. Zack. 2010. Integrating multiple ecosystem services introduction ecological site descriptions; Rangelands 2010 32 (6), pp 49-54.
Hanson, H.C and W. Whitman. 1938. Characteristics of major grassland types in western North Dakota. Ecological Monographs. Vol. 8 No. 1: pp 57-114.
Hendrickson, John R., P. S. Johnson, M. A. Liebig, K. K. Sedivec, and G. A. Halvorson. 2016. Use of ecological sites in managing wildlife and livestock: an example with prairie dogs. Rangelands 38(1): 23-28.
Higgins, Kenneth F. 1984. Lightning Fires in North Dakota grasslands and in pine-savanna lands of South Dakota and Montana. Journal of Range Management 37 (1).
Higgins, K. F., A. D. Kruse, and J. L. Piehl. 1987. Effects of fire in the northern great plains. SDSU Extension Circular Paper 429.
Hirch, K.L. 1985. Habitat type classification of grasslands and shrublands of southwestern North Dakota. Ph.D. Thesis. ND State University.
Mader, E., M. Shepherd, M. Vaughan, and S.H. Black. 2011. Attracting native pollinators: protecting North America's bees and butterflies. Accessed at https://xerces.org, May 1, 2017.
Heitschmidt, R. K., K. D. Klement, and M. R. Haferkamp. 2005. Interactive effects of drought and grazing on northern great plains rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58: pp 11-19.
Montana’s State Wildlife Action Plan. 2015. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Viewed at https://xerces.org/ on May 1, 2017.
Printz, Jeffrey L. and John R. Hendrickson. 2015. Impacts of Kentucky bluegrass Invasion (Poa pratensis) on Ecological Processes in the Northern Great Plains. Rangelands 37(6): pp 226-232.
Redmann, Robert E. 1975. Production ecology of grassland plant communities in western North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 45: pp 83-106.
Robinson, A.C. 2014. Management Plan and Conservation Strategies for Greater Sage Grouse in North Dakota. ND Game and Fish Department.
Sanford, R.C. 1970. Skunk bush in the North Dakota Badlands: Ecology, phytosociology, browse production, and utilization. Ph. D. Thesis. ND State University.
Seabloom, R. 2011. Mammals of North Dakota. ND Institute for Regional Studies.
Sedivec, Kevin K., Jeffrey L. Printz. 2014. Ranchers Guide to Grassland Management IV. NDSU Extension Service publication R1707.
South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks. 2014. South Dakota Wildlife Action Plan. Wildlife Division Report 2014-03.
.
Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, K. Spaeth, J. Hendrickson, and J. Printz. 2014. Extent of Kentucky bluegrass and its effect on native plant species diversity and ecosystem services in the northern great plains of the United State. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7(4): 543-552.
High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska. http://hprcc.unl.edu, Accessed on May 1, 2017.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006.
Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. National Water and Climate Center. (http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)
USDA, NRCS. National Range and Pasture Handbook, September 1997.
USDA, NRCS. National Soil Information System, Information Technology Center. Accessed on May 1, 2017 at http://nasis.nrcs.usda.gov.
USDA, NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed May 2, 2017.
USDA, NRCS, Various published soil surveys.
USDI BLM. Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements. Interagency Technical Reference 1734-3. 1999.
Whitman, Warren, E. Helgeson. 1946. Range Vegetation Studies. North Dakota Agricultural Experimentation Bulletin 340.
Whitman, Warren, H. Hanson, and R. Peterson. 1943. Relation of drought and grazing to North Dakota range lands. North Dakota Agricultural Experimentation Bulletin 320.
Zaczkowski, N. K. 1972. Vascular flora of Billings, Bowman, Golden Valley, and Slope counties, North Dakota. Dissertation, ND State University.
Zimmerman, G. M. 1981. Effects of fire upon selected plant communities in the little Missouri badlands. Thesis, ND State University.
Contributors
ND NRCS: David Dewald, Jonathan Fettig, Jody Forman, Mike Gerbig, Alan Gulsvig, Mark Hayek, Jeanne Heilig, John Kempenich, Chuck Lura, Jeff Printz, Steve Sieler, and Hal Weiser.
Approval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 3/31/2025
Acknowledgments
NRCS would like to acknowledge the United State Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS) for access to USFS properties and technical assistance in ESD development. USFS: Jack Dahl, Nickole Dahl, and Chad Prosser.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | M. Hayek, J. Printz, S. Boltz, R. Kilian, D. Froemke, M. Rasmusson |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist |
Date | 03/31/2025 |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are not expected on this site when slopes are less than 15%. On slopes exceeding 15%, rills will be common but scattered, short (less than 16 inches), and disconnected. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns on slopes less than 15% will be uncommon, short (less than 10 feet), and disconnected with very little visible soil erosion associated with the water flow pattern. On slopes greater than 15%, water flow patterns will be common, long (greater than 10 feet), disconnected with some visible soil erosion associated with the water flow patterns. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Neither pedestals nor terracettes are expected on slopes less than 15%. On slopes greater than 15%, scattered pedestals and terracettes would be expected. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 25 to 40%. On slopes less than 15%, bare ground patches should be relatively small (less than 6 inches in diameter) and disconnected. On slopes greater than 15%, bare ground patches will be slightly larger (less than 12 inches in diameter) but disconnected. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Active gullies are not expected on this site. If present, gully channel(s) are fully vegetated with no active erosion visible. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
No wind-scoured or depositional areas expected on this site. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Plant litter movement is not expected on slopes of less than 15%. On slopes greater than
15%, short movement (less than 36 inches) of fine/small class plant litter is expected. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Stability class averages 5 or greater. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Structure is subangular blocky or granular within the upper A-horizon. A- horizons for this ecological site range from 2 to 6 inches thick. Hue 2.5Y or 10YR with value of 4 or less moist or 4 to 6 dry, and chroma 3 or less moist. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Mid- and short-statured bunchgrasses are dominant and well distributed across the site. Mid- and short-statured rhizomatous grasses and a diverse forb component are subdominant. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
No compaction layers are expected on this site. A naturally occurring rooting restriction (weathered bedrock, shale, or strongly cemented silcrete) occurs from 10 to 20 inches below the soil surface. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Phase 1.1
Mid & short C4 bunch grasses (4); Mid & short C3 bunch grasses (6)Sub-dominant:
Phase 1.1
Mid & short C3 rhizomatous grasses (1); Mid & short C4 rhizomatous grasses (1); Forbs (12)Other:
Minor Phase 1.1:
Grass-likes; Shrub; Tall C4 rhizomatous grasses
Trace Phase 1.1:
Evergreen forbsAdditional:
Due to differences in phenology, root morphology, soil biology relationships, and nutrient cycling Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and crested wheatgrass are included in a new Functional/structural group, mid- and short-statured early cool-season grasses (MSeC3), not expected for this site.
To see a full version 5 rangeland health worksheet with functional/structural group tables. Please use the following hyperlink:
https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/54_Shallow_Loamy_Narrative_FINAL_Ref_FSG.pdf -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Rare but expected on this site with dead centers on some warm- season bunchgrasses expected (5 to 10%). Dead or dying plants/plant parts (warm-season bunchgrass and shrubs) may be common following a multi-year drought. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Plant litter cover is 15 to 35% with a depth of 0.1 to 0.25 inches. Litter is in contact with soil surface. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production: Annual air-dry production is 1400 lbs./ac (reference value) with normal precipitation and temperatures. Low and high production years should yield 800 lbs./ac to 2000 lbs./ac, respectively. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
State and local noxious species, Kentucky bluegrass, smooth bromegrass, crested wheatgrass, creeping juniper, and Rocky Mountain juniper/cedar. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Noninvasive species in all functional/structural groups are vigorous and capable of reproducing annually under normal weather conditions.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.